IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Call For Adoption: draft-seantek-text-markdown-use-cases

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Fri, 30 January 2015 23:51 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A13191A87DF for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 15:51:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z4SJfFFwdD5w for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 15:51:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wi0-x229.google.com (mail-wi0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AB701A877A for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 15:51:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f169.google.com with SMTP id h11so5938304wiw.0 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 15:51:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=SpBekIKC8KT+aeiyho0xHa9QuIERp9A+bgGODVl4ZuU=; b=qQDRMtHzyjJNg7JIZvwdB4KO8M1Gjm2+eIIVCbnJAqEgStPUc66gOGxiXxJorNr8Lk JfSmQ2p5hFeSvOdeTWr1iDLvSNYa24l5NS9BKJggwOJMv7peAhD+KL0vDMGUWzcBC9dz +ECwGnGCjaum/gBXoRZlGOyg6wtkt2CAGK3gaGbjMdldyIZ8vXHbzW4KXOKnkr4hDSB7 6kNdwVvzKk/OZxCzEOBugLPkp/OuIgXLvsNKbDwTJOUWJ1Ja/gYT8MYtEmXgnFYU8N1P XrbrF4fWo02SrF5mbK6R2MYiYojqLrhSmD+cmmBamvIQLIbUfLw/cYmepIFlE9Q4lE9B e+SA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.86.135 with SMTP id p7mr16955891wjz.89.1422661883601; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 15:51:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.27.85.157 with HTTP; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 15:51:23 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwY5Zrm6mkUi9986KPn-RKK-YvyVKbvLwnmCNfiL10JOiA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAL0qLwY5Zrm6mkUi9986KPn-RKK-YvyVKbvLwnmCNfiL10JOiA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 15:51:23 -0800
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwb1=YG+r_FYDxBfPW+fDnvMd_05Ki08BtD6Vy-nBV84Jg@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
To: IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e0102e498352a71050de74876"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/Y9yRMWL17Dsn68TiYpssHNc-IvQ>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Call For Adoption: draft-seantek-text-markdown-use-cases
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 23:51:27 -0000

On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
wrote:

> This note starts a Call For Adoption for
> draft-seantek-text-markdown-use-cases.  This work was split from
> draft-ietf-appsawg-text-markdown which is already undergoing processing
> through APPSAWG.
>
> Note that a Call For Adoption only accepts the document as a first version
> for development by the working group.  The working group can change it as
> it wishes subject to our usual consensus process.
>
> Please reply with support or objection on this thread by January 23, 2015.
>

There was exactly one reply on this thread.  However, since the WG pushed
the author into splitting the main document in this way, we presume that
silence means there is consensus to accept the document.  Thus the author
has been asked to submit it as an APPSAWG item, and we assume it will
appear shortly.

The document pair will have the same milestone, namely April 2015.
Interested participants, please review and comment on both documents soon.
There's certainly nothing wrong with us being done with them early.  Either
way, we need to be able to gauge that there's consensus to publish and that
there has been adequate review before we can proceed.

-MSK, APPSAWG co-chair

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email