IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Call For Adoption: draft-seantek-text-markdown-use-cases

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Fri, 09 January 2015 20:32 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F7FF1A8AEF for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 12:32:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JB6k0eozV-sU for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 12:32:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-we0-x236.google.com (mail-we0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 798141A8AE7 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 12:32:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-we0-f182.google.com with SMTP id w62so9907907wes.13 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 12:32:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=VxCt9WZe1ZJzJo2NUK+UOfg263XNJoqmFF5NWVzHKfQ=; b=I3YH8+TjsJmonFZE6sbp2T6B4f4V/kIarZuaAL00QPdKvE+mT1MmSYn3TJMrKysXGt az+8nJune68Wn6MSYrHx5cfYibpYstiBkHHgP6IFShYJjv9jsdCt3lvSI6Jck34zVEGq sMqY4tCuU+KHw5CduyP7mU9taUGabg6g7zk/njkA9Ak63NlRlTRLToufvBniEW8Tx701 W2wfMQtxlxILcgf3YfFCwbFbdZjbON8MEnlGgYUekwTLk7uDF0Kz8r2IIKoKuFUOMd0h eM2RFpydNiuNdCpvOTLs5xdazBowSJFyd0NDsrEeHgwCHYOsB88qduzXjKlKjez2qqZQ XCkA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.218.39 with SMTP id pd7mr8492586wic.21.1420835567279; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 12:32:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.27.204.198 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 12:32:47 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwY5Zrm6mkUi9986KPn-RKK-YvyVKbvLwnmCNfiL10JOiA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAL0qLwY5Zrm6mkUi9986KPn-RKK-YvyVKbvLwnmCNfiL10JOiA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 12:32:47 -0800
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwbeM8L0tz6=pu3D+H7pZGVEnByn-LqB6RiKm576KxOT1Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
To: IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1134cd5845a56b050c3e0f5c"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/tmbUeHHD94ZA8NEXYIPizcWJoGk>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Call For Adoption: draft-seantek-text-markdown-use-cases
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 20:32:50 -0000

On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
wrote:

> This note starts a Call For Adoption for
> draft-seantek-text-markdown-use-cases.  This work was split from
> draft-ietf-appsawg-text-markdown which is already undergoing processing
> through APPSAWG.
>
> Note that a Call For Adoption only accepts the document as a first version
> for development by the working group.  The working group can change it as
> it wishes subject to our usual consensus process.
>
> Please reply with support or objection on this thread by January 23, 2015.
>

Some other things to consider in this or any Call For Adoption:

- Is the publication of this document (even after development) necessary
and useful?
- Who is the intended audience?
- Is APPSAWG the right venue for this work?  Does it fit within our charter?
- Does it conflict with work going on anywhere else that we should know
about, inside or outside the IETF?
- Does there appear to be enough people prepared to work on it?
- Is there a better alternative document we might adopt instead?

There might be others I'm not considering.  My point here is that it's not
a trivial thing to take on a new document for working group processing, and
that needs due consideration when choosing work for us to adopt.

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email