Re: [apps-discuss] AppsAWG status, and communicating with the chairs
Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> Mon, 01 August 2011 13:48 UTC
Return-Path: <derhoermi@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B69B511E809D for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 06:48:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.545
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.545 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.946, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jb3ThURuEQdm for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 06:48:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9B53411E8075 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 06:48:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 01 Aug 2011 13:48:01 -0000
Received: from dslb-094-223-181-014.pools.arcor-ip.net (EHLO HIVE) [94.223.181.14] by mail.gmx.net (mp054) with SMTP; 01 Aug 2011 15:48:01 +0200
X-Authenticated: #723575
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+tOOw5ZBCt2PlYL1NujikuJ+PTd0qtodMeuIxFiG 5Nef+j3fxyt2Jk
From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 15:48:08 +0200
Message-ID: <6ebd37h4okaio9cbs7m160e6q1i2tgqdph@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
References: <CALaySJ+Bb5_5HS+hqO3v5EK+JMmMCYcNY1o7uuQeZ_-bz1=TRA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJ+Bb5_5HS+hqO3v5EK+JMmMCYcNY1o7uuQeZ_-bz1=TRA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] AppsAWG status, and communicating with the chairs
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 13:48:02 -0000
* Barry Leiba wrote: >Use of the "X-" Prefix in Application Protocols > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-saintandre-xdash Why should this be a standalone document instead of having the ideas there in <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-iab-extension-recs> or some other document that explains issues around extensibility within a broader context than how a "X-" convention can be problematic? -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
- [apps-discuss] AppsAWG status, and communicating … Barry Leiba
- Re: [apps-discuss] AppsAWG status, and communicat… Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: [apps-discuss] AppsAWG status, and communicat… Barry Leiba
- Re: [apps-discuss] AppsAWG status, and communicat… Mark Nottingham