Re: [apps-discuss] Accept-Post HTTP header field

[Erik Wilde <[e-mail]>]

hello barry.

thanks for the feedback.

On 2014-05-07, 12:08 , Barry Leiba wrote:
> I'll quibble with that:
> Experimental is for protocol experiments as well.  "We're not sure
> that we got some of this right, and we want to document it and have
> people try it and see before we say it's a proposed standard."

the proposal is rather simple and similar to what has been done with the 
existing Accept-Patch header field. because of this, i think we're 
fairly confident that it does not contain major issues. we also do have 
existing implementations using it already.

> That said, I don't disagree with the last thing Mark said: If you
> think the protocol needs experimentation, make it Experimental.  If
> you're reasonably confident that the protocol is right, but you're
> just not sure how much deployment it'll get, make it Proposed
> Standard.

ok, i guess in this case we'll stick to the standard route. i have added 
a proper registration template as suggested by martin, and i am 
wondering if there are any other issues i should look at before 
publishing an updated version of the draft.

thanks and cheers,

dret.

ps: 
https://github.com/dret/I-D/blob/master/accept-post/draft-wilde-accept-post-03.txt 
is where the currently unpublished -03 lives

-- 
erik wilde | mailto:[e-mail]  -  tel:[phone] |
            | UC Berkeley  -  School of Information (ISchool) |
            | http://dret.net/netdret http://twitter.com/dret |