Re: [apps-discuss] Accept-Post HTTP header field

["Martin J. Dürst" <[e-mail]>]

Hello Erik,

On 2014/05/07 09:14, Erik Wilde wrote:
> hello.
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/ldp/#header-accept-post (the "Linked Data
> Platform") is a current W3C document in last call WD status, and it
> introduces/uses the Accept-Post header field proposed in a current draft:
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wilde-accept-post
>
> we have publicized this proposed header field on this list, and the
> latest draft also includes a list of known implementations of this
> header field:
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wilde-accept-post-02#section-6

What's the intent behind "Feature at Risk" box? I can see two reasons 
for this: a) trying to be really good citizens, and not going ahead with 
something that's not properly registered; and b) not being confident 
that this is a good idea.

If it's the former, than see below.

> after making the specification available for a while, and listing known
> implementations, we are wondering about next steps. what it would take
> to get this draft moving towards an experimental RFC (apart from some
> references that will need to be updated).

Why experimental? Why not standards track?

An alternative would be to do a provisional registration, because this 
doesn't need an RFC. That would give you some slack for moving ahead 
with the Linked Data Platform spec without being at the mercy of a 
potentially low level of interest in the IETF.

With respect to the draft itself, I don't see a registration template.

Regards,   Martin.