[apps-discuss] [appsdir] AppsDir review of draft-polk-ipr-disclosure

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> (by way of S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>) Tue, 22 May 2012 19:07 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5716621F86B8 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 May 2012 12:07:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e0IAaGflJZYt for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 May 2012 12:07:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 504E321F8647 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 May 2012 12:07:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4MJ79Vt027185 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 22 May 2012 12:07:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1337713642; i=@cloudmark.com; bh=E+MSo8qyxS3+Ifif4a3Y7l8SGUg9a7nH3bgxBETc5hU=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc; b=WWzk4XyW9OVAnZ0bip4o7njZ5yaTHfrn0fOIG8hL19nQz8ZJNc+bIunE1pJ3GyZtb geFLIrJOUhplNMXlU5VbMj1OisGW5OqVPriW66F7TRyy+FJ7Xgh9Ar2JYYZ76NxjhH ASOKkkNnpHvfTsOojh2neETwEfov2tSiHj/6i+Lg=
Message-Id: <>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 12:06:43 -0700
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Subject: [apps-discuss] [appsdir] AppsDir review of draft-polk-ipr-disclosure
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 19:07:24 -0000


I am forwarding this review to have a reference for the tracker.

I have been selected as the Applications Area Directorate reviewer 
for this draft.  (For background on appsdir, please see 

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments 
you may receive.  Please wait for direction from your document 
shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

Document: draft-polk-ipr-disclosure-03
Title: Promoting Compliance with Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) 
Disclosure Rules
Reviewer: Murray S. Kucherawy
Review Date: May 22, 2012
IETF Last Call Date: ends May 28, 2012
IESG Telechat Date: not scheduled

Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC, 
though I have a question about that proposed status.

Major Issues:

1. Should this not be a BCP?

Minor Issues:



1. Section 1.1: s/section/Section/

Appendix A, several locations: a "&t;" entity should probably be "&lt;".

appsdir mailing list