IETF Logo Mail Archive

[apps-discuss] [appsdir] AppsDir review of draft-polk-ipr-disclosure

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> (by way of S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>) Tue, 22 May 2012 19:07 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5716621F86B8 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 May 2012 12:07:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e0IAaGflJZYt for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 May 2012 12:07:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 504E321F8647 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 May 2012 12:07:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([41.136.234.13]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4MJ79Vt027185 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 22 May 2012 12:07:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1337713642; i=@cloudmark.com; bh=E+MSo8qyxS3+Ifif4a3Y7l8SGUg9a7nH3bgxBETc5hU=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc; b=WWzk4XyW9OVAnZ0bip4o7njZ5yaTHfrn0fOIG8hL19nQz8ZJNc+bIunE1pJ3GyZtb geFLIrJOUhplNMXlU5VbMj1OisGW5OqVPriW66F7TRyy+FJ7Xgh9Ar2JYYZ76NxjhH ASOKkkNnpHvfTsOojh2neETwEfov2tSiHj/6i+Lg=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20120522120449.09c91d90@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 12:06:43 -0700
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Subject: [apps-discuss] [appsdir] AppsDir review of draft-polk-ipr-disclosure
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 19:07:24 -0000

Hello,

I am forwarding this review to have a reference for the tracker.

I have been selected as the Applications Area Directorate reviewer 
for this draft.  (For background on appsdir, please see 
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/ApplicationsAreaDirectorate).

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments 
you may receive.  Please wait for direction from your document 
shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

Document: draft-polk-ipr-disclosure-03
Title: Promoting Compliance with Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) 
Disclosure Rules
Reviewer: Murray S. Kucherawy
Review Date: May 22, 2012
IETF Last Call Date: ends May 28, 2012
IESG Telechat Date: not scheduled

Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC, 
though I have a question about that proposed status.

Major Issues:

1. Should this not be a BCP?

Minor Issues:

(none)

Nits:

1. Section 1.1: s/section/Section/

Appendix A, several locations: a "&t;" entity should probably be "&lt;".

-MSK
_______________________________________________
appsdir mailing list
appsdir@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/appsdir

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email