Re: [apps-discuss] Gen-ART review of draft-bormann-cbor-04

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Fri, 09 August 2013 19:22 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3330F21F9C6F; Fri, 9 Aug 2013 12:22:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.481
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.481 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.119, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 50+FLKPGeH8K; Fri, 9 Aug 2013 12:22:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22f.google.com (mail-wi0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0905121F9CA4; Fri, 9 Aug 2013 12:15:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f175.google.com with SMTP id hq12so54075wib.8 for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 12:15:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=P80X2GWxj+KN8MQRcIAotFWswVu1xzQmFUH0eR05jqg=; b=pRdcidlps6o6xqI500MMoX7u1d5nnpQSvgxqWo98PED0/IBEjjC2+tgsJvXaERH5tD p83zrtM58bNtvF+O7iw9bwqVOpcjNu2z8syowuaWdSDR3/Dg0RsTNZIlMwFqS86Ieiss ORUHTufnUh7SEFLZzu0eaBr3u4aeXsezcPUYUC703ZjbQshZvReNYT/qiFPM2p6zytkZ aE63qcY72Nka3BTAy26hBZLIdPzAR7wdEWNPb9YapDr33zMt0szQb0eyC97QjW/3DBYu y6OzIXaRUEG48G2FNb8qG5ts5nYM2Y9k5ioZTzC+u1mZ7a+4OoO4iCPfNbKr5fBuMwII lNYw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.78.110 with SMTP id a14mr1234019wjx.84.1376075759165; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 12:15:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.28.39 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Aug 2013 12:15:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <A723FC6ECC552A4D8C8249D9E07425A71418233A@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com>
References: <CABkgnnXtCBHnOpY_=t7yWD-+7rSFHKdUi0VGUSVJqXq+xV-G2g@mail.gmail.com> <A723FC6ECC552A4D8C8249D9E07425A71418233A@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 20:15:59 +0100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnW2un9Dn+2rkdq=QSZPE9WYE-Rap=_HfwTj_CaahG=D=Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: "Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)" <jhildebr@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: "draft-bormann-cbor-04.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-bormann-cbor-04.all@tools.ietf.org>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Gen-ART review of draft-bormann-cbor-04
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 19:22:20 -0000

On 5 August 2013 18:43, Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr) <jhildebr@cisco.com> wrote:
> Sorry, my response is also correspondingly long.

I'll be brief.  Though Joe missed my point on several of his rebuttals
(which I found to be an odd thing to do anyway), I see no reason to
quibble.  I think that the bulk of the comments are valid, though I
might disagree on several.