IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-jennings-app-dns-update-00

Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com> Wed, 16 July 2008 02:40 UTC

Return-Path: <apps-discuss-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-apps-discuss-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A28273A6892; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 19:40:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02DDC3A6892 for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 19:40:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.419
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.419 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.120, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1Ig2Ere+VLnr for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 19:40:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com (sj-iport-6.cisco.com [171.71.176.117]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 253923A67D4 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 19:40:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.30,370,1212364800"; d="scan'208";a="127224825"
Received: from sj-dkim-1.cisco.com ([171.71.179.21]) by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 16 Jul 2008 02:40:34 +0000
Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com (sj-core-1.cisco.com [171.71.177.237]) by sj-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m6G2eXHO006388; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 19:40:33 -0700
Received: from [192.168.4.177] (sjc-fluffy-vpn1.cisco.com [10.25.236.82]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id m6G2eXtN019427; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 02:40:33 GMT
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
To: Patrik Fältström <patrik@frobbit.se>
In-Reply-To: <A442AFA9-C421-4FAC-A212-4FCFA22B0C5F@frobbit.se>
Impp: xmpp:cullenfluffyjennings@jabber.org
Subject: Re: draft-jennings-app-dns-update-00
References: <20080707024501.AE0A33A6947@core3.amsl.com> <89A47DA0-8E2F-4247-A21F-E9B1777A0856@cisco.com> <20080708055828.GA6547@x27.adm.denic.de> <A442AFA9-C421-4FAC-A212-4FCFA22B0C5F@frobbit.se>
Message-Id: <17123861-967B-4320-AB1D-E98C5D251BAE@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v928.1)
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 19:40:23 -0700
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.928.1)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=560; t=1216176034; x=1217040034; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim1004; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=fluffy@cisco.com; z=From:=20Cullen=20Jennings=20<fluffy@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20draft-jennings-app-dns-update-00 |Sender:=20; bh=Nr7DxXjq9BJc00pH50yfTp1sRKlJbKjldcSON521OXQ=; b=oH8U8CMqJpxSpH9eg5nqYS+WooevwYeXmcaNonI9gPxE7COYCs90bBP3hp OVyopfUFA0shymCiE+E7Qahi/JDvW7q4k1kHdnTwmQoVyJGc1Cses0UMGBCT K9vnB/p0bGgrnK4FmuDhAWfoX6pQUauCR7H4BMxwF6yoGVq/dYM9Q=;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-1; header.From=fluffy@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim1004 verified; );
Cc: Peter Koch <pk@DENIC.DE>, apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"; DelSp="yes"
Sender: apps-discuss-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: apps-discuss-bounces@ietf.org

On Jul 9, 2008, at 1:19 AM, Patrik Fältström wrote:

>> 1) We do have Dynamic Updates and EPP as "provisioning" protocols.
>>  Which deficiencies is this approach trying to address in particular?
>
> Specifically I see need for explicit text on why Dynamic Updates is  
> "not good enough".

Agree this section is needed. I'm not planning to do anything with  
this draft before (or at) Dublin but if I revise the draft, I will add  
a section about when it is appropriate and see if anything intelligent  
can be put there.

_______________________________________________
Apps-Discuss mailing list
Apps-Discuss@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email