Re: [apps-discuss] proposal for Virtual desktop infrastructure (VDI) work in APP area

Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com> Wed, 09 March 2011 04:51 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AA993A6817 for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 20:51:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.34
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.34 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.259, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5nn3+I54w7Bm for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 20:51:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sj-iport-3.cisco.com (sj-iport-3.cisco.com [171.71.176.72]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C18083A6807 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 20:51:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=fluffy@cisco.com; l=822; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1299646344; x=1300855944; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc: content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=4bfWMoHEB9bNyN+j2uvyNaEs/ihV/Ubh0XA7jABZBU4=; b=UlS+3IIwmavm/iFYMpAu8zT9JjuVuis1gV/pWMdF1cACwC5HvPyL8xXc vU4cJHXH6QGItz9aWPpoDhIfK8O3fvjIJjuFkWC5DZFmudGbSMQryrBAF 2gCvyK4Ku/rH70ZU1l9OyQyatzQL+LnYWKjrFt3CYqQW9QXp4QRJypeQt A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAHuWdk2rR7H+/2dsb2JhbACma3SmP5wthWMEhR2HFYNH
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.62,288,1297036800"; d="scan'208";a="275324102"
Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com ([171.71.177.254]) by sj-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 09 Mar 2011 04:52:16 +0000
Received: from [192.168.4.100] (rcdn-fluffy-8712.cisco.com [10.99.9.19]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p294qF1R002782; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 04:52:16 GMT
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D72D41A.7060708@vpnc.org>
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 21:54:51 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5E76135C-0232-4390-A4B4-CE5D6C7B1DCC@cisco.com>
References: <20110306001006.20028.qmail@joyce.lan> <4D72D41A.7060708@vpnc.org>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] proposal for Virtual desktop infrastructure (VDI) work in APP area
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 04:51:17 -0000

Paul, I'm sure I should be embarrassed to ask this and it is somewhere in my inbox ... but do you have point to the two proposal from you and Bhumip. Thanks, Cullen

On Mar 5, 2011, at 5:23 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:

> On 3/5/11 4:10 PM, John Levine wrote:
>>> Currently there are no standard VDI protocols.
>> 
>> Isn't the de-facto standard VNC? It will be RFC 6143, probably coming
>> out this week.
> 
> VNC covers one part of what is being described, namely the KVM control of the guest OS. The proposal Bhumip sent goes well beyond that control, and the one I propose goes beyond what Bhumip has proposed.
> 
> --Paul Hoffman
> _______________________________________________
> apps-discuss mailing list
> apps-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss