[apps-discuss] WEIRDS WG report

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Tue, 04 March 2014 21:41 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46F461A0177 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 13:41:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ebG3uNrVqnhg for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 13:41:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pb0-x230.google.com (mail-pb0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::230]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C7A31A00F0 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 13:41:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pb0-f48.google.com with SMTP id md12so111572pbc.35 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 04 Mar 2014 13:41:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=q3eU1seeaR1y5Rcs7xV65EGlEQUQNZm1m1WOLlpiMqI=; b=dTxjHI0L8gKuR3xz6rHQzsWkEb2zUkXqyxcxpArhghMcWHYk5Jt2gHYm7yudO1PKtw AxTAFhntRnr8hItyGc+mVHA1Buzoxa5SG3APmQDCqGRvabOAGOLbdZ/8pBW5oPZ4fzUx VTpnnojE0HBtnGUk2NnrImhX+dIHuaj0lzUm5w2Zl3/DGiaJi7KaY+4FDXWldejtC+If s7MOhM98FUsOOeYzeDUtMIcsTWy7JgPPq/4a65T1EImXR/W7HA/lkdX15y6P5JRYPxLR A4JNiHvwxevHcn4cbVrk5s0OOd5aceAIxEZRTeXNZ4WJBwc+OBxgBYazk56/GeiSvZDM YHbA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.66.163.138 with SMTP id yi10mr2046977pab.95.1393969304374; Tue, 04 Mar 2014 13:41:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.66.220.102 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 13:41:44 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 21:41:44 +0000
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwY1VWQgk_72Bw1XNgrfXb6uAS0=tUEDyPYQ9ECmD9pcZA@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
To: IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b86f2623716a404f3cec539"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/kbmkJH5sHPmNMfZjdJBYEk9tIY8
Subject: [apps-discuss] WEIRDS WG report
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 21:41:50 -0000

WEIRDS met today and discussed what we believe are its remaining issues.

The group discussed the outcome of a design team meeting that tried to
address two issues at once: the issue an imposed URI structure
(draft-nottingham-uri-get-off-my-lawn) and the methodology by which to find
an authoritative registry that can further delegate.  Both issues are being
addressed by allowing a key-value table that supports longest-match lookups
resulting in  URI templates that are then used to construct a query that
will either return an answer or a redirection.  The WG will continue this
discussion on its mailing list and select a path forward.  Participants
were asked to open tracker items for any remaining issues on the open
documents (query, redirection, bootstrapping) so they can be driven to
resolution.

The discussion of the publication of the table (IANA being the logical
point) ventured into the complications that come with the IETF creating
domain registries and imposing policies potentially outside of its
purview.  This issue has not been completely resolved but we believe there
are ways forward through careful crafting of the language and keeping the
IANA section to an absolute minimum.

Finally, a report was given of interoperability tests performed prior to
the IETF meeting.  No specification issues were discovered and a fair
number of server as well as client implementations interoperate.  A couple
of issues were identified and we are at or close to consensus on resolution.

The chairs believe that the work of the group may conclude between now and
Toronto, so this may have been our final meeting.

-MSK and Olaf, co-chairs, WEIRDS