IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-14.txt

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Mon, 20 May 2013 07:49 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19D0A21F8521; Mon, 20 May 2013 00:49:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.454
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.145, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MtDf+ZAGASyT; Mon, 20 May 2013 00:49:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x231.google.com (mail-wg0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::231]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D358821F8539; Mon, 20 May 2013 00:49:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id y10so147608wgg.28 for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 20 May 2013 00:49:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=K1CmhgR3+bvA9Xh/jX/rjRpsv+IkUEroBD+5PtQo/LM=; b=ecwP5Z12luTuTbnkFVcO+PA8EjxpLs7v+lmBb0IEpYk/Du0pEXZxj5coBKgrY89aG3 mOy0m0+/5dvTvSfnkAmDqUUDrxRK2gvKycAXD+yGaus2QEtRxRBw2M3UQ28noixq6jZV AE2ZIpivaV9XM3jfL+FRkCYnjioGIY3liBhXmNzp3T+8/lEJA9esBOabu4yoH4ySMLz5 lqoDhIFQZMxy3p/JG/UVZT+N60vtQTT3nuWlUnEtjVkUhyv9HfXnmcYNt9IKy03CjEzZ vir68mpdFnjprzbotCzqZDUGrqj8CzN6VsBNVP/UzYHFTU1u4fOS5uBAJLmdHZw381FG GrYg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.210.242 with SMTP id mx18mr11069821wic.14.1369036139666; Mon, 20 May 2013 00:48:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.14.34 with HTTP; Mon, 20 May 2013 00:48:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <9E5D5870D2E1345B7ABA6971@cyrus.local>
References: <9E5D5870D2E1345B7ABA6971@cyrus.local>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 00:48:59 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwau0JFy_ipdf_PzJoyxUUcStuudAbNbVL1cT-jdaVuhgA@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
To: Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>, "spfbis@ietf.org" <spfbis@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c262e8ca24bb04dd21909d"
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-14.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 07:49:05 -0000

On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 6:50 AM, Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name> wrote:

> Nits:
>         Section 2.6 and Section 8 appear to duplicate a lot of similar
> information. Please consider trimming down Section 2.6 and have it refer to
> Section 8 for full details.
>
>
>
Hi Cyrus,

There is a little duplication in there that I'm attempting to help the
editor to reduce to a minimum.  It's intentional, however, because the WG
concluded it was necessary to separate the list of possible SPF results
from any kind of normative statements (or even inference) about what an
operator should do with one of those results.  Thus, 2.6 lists protocol
elements, and 8 is basically some operational discussion.

I may also say the above in a more condensed form just so it's clear why
the apparent duplication exists.

Thanks for the review,

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email