IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] [spfbis] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-14.txt

Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name> Tue, 28 May 2013 14:40 UTC

Return-Path: <cyrus@daboo.name>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B405121F9759; Tue, 28 May 2013 07:40:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mk6SAlWNMEQL; Tue, 28 May 2013 07:40:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from daboo.name (daboo.name [173.13.55.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F32C421F97A5; Tue, 28 May 2013 07:40:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by daboo.name (Postfix) with ESMTP id 989124443336; Tue, 28 May 2013 10:40:08 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com
Received: from daboo.name ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (daboo.name [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YJBZUcuBhF3j; Tue, 28 May 2013 10:40:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.11] (unknown [17.45.162.251]) by daboo.name (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 674CC444332B; Tue, 28 May 2013 10:40:06 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 10:40:07 -0400
From: Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Message-ID: <2B58ED5599DDF1DD894E64BA@cyrus.local>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20130523142426.0daf25c8@resistor.net>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20130429065657.0d392368@elandnews.com> <1778285.8glKQALeLt@scott-latitude-e6320> <6.2.5.6.2.20130523142426.0daf25c8@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.1.0a3 (Mac OS X)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline; size="273"
Cc: spfbis@ietf.org, draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis.all@tools.ietf.org, apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] [spfbis] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-14.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 14:40:13 -0000

Hi S,

--On May 23, 2013 2:28:31 PM -0700 S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> wrote:

> Do the above comments address your AppsDir review (
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/current/msg09353.html )?

Yes, I am OK with the changes adopted.

-- 
Cyrus Daboo

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email