[apps-discuss] draft-nottingham-json-home-02

"Ted M. Young [@jitterted]" <tedyoung@gmail.com> Mon, 29 April 2013 22:36 UTC

Return-Path: <tedyoung@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0DD821F9A96 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 15:36:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AhqCZNqQMyq0 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 15:36:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-f176.google.com (mail-lb0-f176.google.com [209.85.217.176]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 752CC21F9A81 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 15:36:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lb0-f176.google.com with SMTP id p10so1011362lbv.7 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 15:36:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=aYZaDiJaIGaiFEeLZsvvw+/IoHllJQ28D5INjYtq8aY=; b=hLL2kVAwPex2yXpn7XWecgsDmu2+S3GepCO8SJpCoXFs8HdMlSwf3ObwJlgMgM7w91 UiW7Pyip3kHAJIAhiKHL2HfqoHJrkIHX9OO9Xgr9lupP/4ob9Ra+frGkyLoIEymr9anb +4hLR2bi+umroxvBUfIWq/ghxz9eh5NjpBlHpTpIjb3fR0kGJVGnf7EjWC9MbDbjf7JD 5CN0tlJnY2ei0fp0OPgSKgfVXIuLc1avUGBpOTrxZBaUaJc78zTpAar7n8RyZ9B7JmBj 6bD789xdp7t/rAdL7YmENteOq4mD2/el0/Y2OVhjXTO1bBR0EpNTi+9w6NfKv9g8MHvy lJlQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.21.106 with SMTP id u10mr4177835lae.11.1367274962200; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 15:36:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.175.202 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 15:36:02 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 15:36:02 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOp_J8nfdqTxXJA8siTyhjTaxuhGYs9wWTMuFu2hCe6mccTQig@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Ted M. Young [@jitterted]" <tedyoung@gmail.com>
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013d17006eae4d04db878234
Cc: mnot@mnot.net
Subject: [apps-discuss] draft-nottingham-json-home-02
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 22:36:09 -0000

I see that this draft has expired. Is there an -03 coming up (I see it in
your github)? We're implementing it in a RESTful experiment and it'd be
nice if it were still considered active (not that expiration would stop us
for this experiment).

Also, I've been trying to find if there's been discussion around the name
of the media type, i.e., /json-home vs. /home+json. I don't want to beat a
dead horse if this has already been discussed and the reasons explained.

Thanks,
;ted

--
http://about.me/tedmyoung