[apps-discuss] Sunset HTTP header field
Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu> Tue, 04 August 2015 01:44 UTC
Return-Path: <dret@berkeley.edu>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 554811A8865 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 18:44:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.312
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.312 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1BiC_ay0rUcD for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 18:44:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cm03fe.IST.Berkeley.EDU (cm03fe.IST.Berkeley.EDU [169.229.218.144]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D52821A8863 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 18:44:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 108-67-65-66.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net ([108.67.65.66] helo=[192.168.1.76]) by cm03fe.ist.berkeley.edu with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (auth plain:dret@berkeley.edu) (envelope-from <dret@berkeley.edu>) id 1ZMRGt-00063y-Cj for apps-discuss@ietf.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 18:44:05 -0700
Message-ID: <55C018E1.8080405@berkeley.edu>
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 18:44:01 -0700
From: Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "apps-discuss@ietf.org application-layer protocols" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/oWhawblPB_gRBLDdP1JomFGqE9k>
Subject: [apps-discuss] Sunset HTTP header field
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 01:44:07 -0000
hello. a little while ago there was a brief thread on apps-discuss regarding how to expose information about "URI lifetime" in an HTTP response: https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/current/msg14343.html it took me a little while to write something up, but i have just published a first draft proposing a "Sunset" HTTP header field, that serves that purpose: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wilde-sunset-header-00 it is as simple as possible right now (a simple timestamp advertising when a resource might become unavailable). i'd be very interested in some feedback about what else might be needed, and of course in people finding this useful and maybe implementing it in their services. thanks a lot and cheers, dret. -- erik wilde | mailto:dret@berkeley.edu - tel:+1-510-2061079 | | UC Berkeley - School of Information (ISchool) | | http://dret.net/netdret http://twitter.com/dret |
- Re: [apps-discuss] Sunset HTTP header field Erik Wilde
- [apps-discuss] Sunset HTTP header field Erik Wilde
- Re: [apps-discuss] Sunset HTTP header field James M Snell