IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Reivew of draft-johansson-loa-registry

Leif Johansson <leifj@sunet.se> Wed, 11 April 2012 19:14 UTC

Return-Path: <leifj@sunet.se>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB3EA21F84EB; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 12:14:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.421
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.421 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.178, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h1XpBatxQv3B; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 12:14:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from backup-server.nordu.net (backup-server.nordu.net [IPv6:2001:948:4:1::66]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B258B21F84D9; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 12:14:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.11] (ua-83-227-179-169.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se [83.227.179.169]) (authenticated bits=0) by backup-server.nordu.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q3BJEfBY007765 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 11 Apr 2012 21:14:44 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4F85D81F.4010901@sunet.se>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 21:14:39 +0200
From: Leif Johansson <leifj@sunet.se>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120329 Thunderbird/11.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <CA+9kkMC0vnzoHMVwfNYFrjhMLoCSArj6r+XBgevAx6+f5cfCxQ@mail.gmail.com> <4F8182D7.1030106@sunet.se> <CA+9kkMAwb_Uu1_X9CwdX-w_MC4Pr51=aQ1QybGW0_H3QMKm9ig@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMAwb_Uu1_X9CwdX-w_MC4Pr51=aQ1QybGW0_H3QMKm9ig@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: draft-johansson-loa-registry.all@tools.ietf.org, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Reivew of draft-johansson-loa-registry
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 19:14:49 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


>>>> Would an informational URL of
>>>> mailto:loa-registrant@example.org  be acceptable?
>>>> 
> 
> Ah yes. Good catch!
> 
> 
>> Just to confirm, you plan to add a list?

yep

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk+F2BsACgkQ8Jx8FtbMZnez+ACghTRcI5fRnvtFaoE5KycJVhwX
GdYAoMB+11OHyLwCr2j1uBezWLPEJogU
=E1gr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email