Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-01.txt
Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com> Mon, 26 September 2011 16:21 UTC
Return-Path: <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA3B821F8D86 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 09:21:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.476
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.476 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.123, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rO1gTiZw+F8V for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 09:21:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com (mauve.mrochek.com [66.59.230.40]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DB5421F8D82 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 09:21:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dkim-sign.mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01O6I5IYZWZ400W98J@mauve.mrochek.com> for apps-discuss@ietf.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 09:21:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01O68GZ66CTS014O5Z@mauve.mrochek.com>; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 09:21:48 -0700 (PDT)
Message-id: <01O6I5IVA4F2014O5Z@mauve.mrochek.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 09:18:12 -0700
From: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
In-reply-to: "Your message dated Mon, 26 Sep 2011 11:22:58 +0100" <4E805282.5050004@isode.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; Format="flowed"
References: <20110922053351.2337.12758.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4E805282.5050004@isode.com>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-01.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 16:21:16 -0000
> internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: > >A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Applications Area Working Group Working Group of the IETF. > > > > Title : The Multipart/Report Media Type for the Reporting of Mail System Administrative Messages > > Author(s) : Murray S. Kucherawy > > Filename : draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-01.txt > > Pages : 15 > > Date : 2011-09-21 > > > > The multipart/report Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) > > media type is a general "family" or "container" type for electronic > > mail reports of any kind. Although this memo defines only the use of > > the multipart/report media type with respect to delivery status > > reports, mail processing programs will benefit if a single media type > > is used for all kinds of reports. > > > > This memo obsoletes RFC3462. > > > > > The new version addresses my earlier concerns. > One small new issue: > The newly added: > 5. Registering New Report Types > Registration of new media types for the purpose of creating a new > report format SHOULD note in the Intended Usage section of the media > type registration that the type being registered is suitable for use > as a report-type in the context of this specification. > What does "suitable for use as a report-type" means exactly? It means you're supposed to say something like: This media type is suitable for use in report-type parts per RFC3462bis. in the Intended Usage section of the type registration. In other words, this is a recommended action, not some sort of registration criteria the type must meet. > Do you mean > the name of the new media type can be used as the value of this attribute? No, that's a given for such types. Ned
- [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc… internet-drafts
- Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg… Ned Freed
- Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg… t.petch
- Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg… Ned Freed
- Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg… t.petch