Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-01.txt

Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com> Mon, 26 September 2011 16:21 UTC

Return-Path: <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA3B821F8D86 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 09:21:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.476
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.476 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.123, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rO1gTiZw+F8V for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 09:21:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com (mauve.mrochek.com [66.59.230.40]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DB5421F8D82 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 09:21:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dkim-sign.mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01O6I5IYZWZ400W98J@mauve.mrochek.com> for apps-discuss@ietf.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 09:21:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01O68GZ66CTS014O5Z@mauve.mrochek.com>; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 09:21:48 -0700 (PDT)
Message-id: <01O6I5IVA4F2014O5Z@mauve.mrochek.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 09:18:12 -0700
From: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
In-reply-to: "Your message dated Mon, 26 Sep 2011 11:22:58 +0100" <4E805282.5050004@isode.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; Format="flowed"
References: <20110922053351.2337.12758.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4E805282.5050004@isode.com>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-01.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 16:21:16 -0000

> internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:

> >A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Applications Area Working Group Working Group of the IETF.
> >
> >	Title           : The Multipart/Report Media Type for the Reporting of Mail System Administrative Messages
> >	Author(s)       : Murray S. Kucherawy
> >	Filename        : draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-01.txt
> >	Pages           : 15
> >	Date            : 2011-09-21
> >
> >   The multipart/report Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME)
> >   media type is a general &quot;family&quot; or &quot;container&quot; type for electronic
> >   mail reports of any kind.  Although this memo defines only the use of
> >   the multipart/report media type with respect to delivery status
> >   reports, mail processing programs will benefit if a single media type
> >   is used for all kinds of reports.
> >
> >   This memo obsoletes RFC3462.
> >
> >
> The new version addresses my earlier concerns.
> One small new issue:

> The newly added:
> 5. Registering New Report Types
               
>     Registration of new media types for the purpose of creating a new
>     report format SHOULD note in the Intended Usage section of the media
>     type registration that the type being registered is suitable for use
>     as a report-type in the context of this specification.

> What does "suitable for use as a report-type" means exactly?

It means you're supposed to say something like:

    This media type is suitable for use in report-type parts per RFC3462bis.

in the Intended Usage section of the type registration.

In other words, this is a recommended action, not some sort of registration
criteria the type must meet.

> Do you mean
> the name of the new media type can be used as the value of this attribute?

No, that's a given for such types.

				Ned