Re: [apps-discuss] draft-sullivan-domain-origin-assert-00

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Fri, 11 May 2012 13:40 UTC

Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 09:40:49 -0400
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20120511134040.GC15782@mail.yitter.info>
References: <4FAC5524.5080503@KingsMountain.com> <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E00392811DCE2@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E00392811DCE2@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] draft-sullivan-domain-origin-assert-00
Precedence: list

On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 05:32:26AM +0000, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> The term "origin" has been in use in DNS zone files (cf. RFC1034) far longer than there's been a Web.  :-)
> 

While true, this is yet another reason to avoid the term, since the
"origin" in this case isn't $ORIGIN.  I think Jeff's right, and that I
better come up with something else.

Thanks!

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com

[apps-discuss] draft-sullivan-domain-origin-asser… Andrew Sullivan
Re: [apps-discuss] draft-sullivan-domain-origin-a… =JeffH
Re: [apps-discuss] draft-sullivan-domain-origin-a… Murray S. Kucherawy
Re: [apps-discuss] draft-sullivan-domain-origin-a… Andrew Sullivan
Re: [apps-discuss] draft-sullivan-domain-origin-a… Murray S. Kucherawy
Re: [apps-discuss] draft-sullivan-domain-origin-a… =JeffH