IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] draft-sullivan-domain-origin-assert-00

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Fri, 11 May 2012 13:45 UTC

Return-Path: <msk@cloudmark.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32BCD21F8686 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 May 2012 06:45:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.622
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.622 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.023, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HimnN-Ujymjp for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 May 2012 06:45:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.cloudmark.com (cmgw1.cloudmark.com [208.83.136.25]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E14CB21F867E for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 May 2012 06:45:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com ([72.5.239.26]) by mail.cloudmark.com with bizsmtp id 8dlW1j0010as01C01dlWWi; Fri, 11 May 2012 06:45:30 -0700
X-CMAE-Match: 0
X-CMAE-Score: 0.00
X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=R/iB6KtX c=1 sm=1 a=QMZKka45TBd+hNGtXG2bIg==:17 a=ldJM1g7oyCcA:10 a=5J6hupTm0N4A:10 a=zutiEJmiVI4A:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=YNuDS72HhdSmmqzv1xAA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=lZB815dzVvQA:10 a=QMZKka45TBd+hNGtXG2bIg==:117
Received: from EXCH-MBX901.corp.cloudmark.com ([fe80::addf:849a:f71c:4a82]) by exch-htcas902.corp.cloudmark.com ([fe80::54de:dc60:5f3e:334%10]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Fri, 11 May 2012 06:45:30 -0700
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [apps-discuss] draft-sullivan-domain-origin-assert-00
Thread-Index: AQHNLwg4nbfk6riRHEKeoJOGVS6Ux5bEEGYQgAD+O4D//4vLEA==
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 13:45:30 +0000
Message-ID: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E00392811E1B5@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <4FAC5524.5080503@KingsMountain.com> <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E00392811DCE2@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com> <20120511134040.GC15782@mail.yitter.info>
In-Reply-To: <20120511134040.GC15782@mail.yitter.info>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [67.160.203.60]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cloudmark.com; s=default; t=1336743931; bh=YTlEGUlfa6IBsPZsBF5gf9BX3SLUKaCeXVngNPy60Wo=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=urfIkmnFp7A0R7ZpoL3xmRG9DYZ+ywViKoDy0yvyVgw99DS0/5LSi44cSkLrbyttI FToB4SvWAgrqMWRZtxh5s1NIDCL54qSAL8XrtuMhsbwoAcTvIBL2nANCz10h8wKX65 orhh/iPq+dDXpOJJNVoJcMAsW4l2621cse9wleEA=
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] draft-sullivan-domain-origin-assert-00
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 13:45:34 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: apps-discuss-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:apps-discuss-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Sullivan
> Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 6:41 AM
> To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] draft-sullivan-domain-origin-assert-00
> 
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 05:32:26AM +0000, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> > The term "origin" has been in use in DNS zone files (cf. RFC1034) far
> > longer than there's been a Web.  :-)
> 
> While true, this is yet another reason to avoid the term, since the
> "origin" in this case isn't $ORIGIN.  I think Jeff's right, and that I
> better come up with something else.

That was kind of my point; it's got enough "deployed" meaning in both worlds as to be more of a collision than Jeff was saying.

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email