Re: [apps-discuss] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7303 (4578)

Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> Tue, 05 January 2016 12:02 UTC

Return-Path: <chris@w3.org>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAE991B2B05 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 04:02:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.389
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.389 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MANGLED_WRLDWD=2.3, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eevks243XAQh for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 04:02:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from raoul.w3.org (raoul.w3.org [IPv6:2001:470:8b2d:804:52:12:128:0]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B26AC1B2B00 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 04:02:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ppp-94-67-39-236.home.otenet.gr ([94.67.39.236] helo=[192.168.1.91]) by raoul.w3.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.1:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <chris@w3.org>) id 1aGQJi-000ENd-Is; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 12:02:22 +0000
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 14:02:17 +0200
From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Organization: W3C
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <1707442344.20160105140217@w3.org>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, ht@inf.ed.ac.uk, barryleiba@computer.org, superuser@gmail.com, alexey.melnikov@isode.com
In-Reply-To: <20160105014245.88C5A18000C@rfc-editor.org>
References: <20160105014245.88C5A18000C@rfc-editor.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/u4FnZBw_BtuUjqfkcjX55_ohI3I>
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7303 (4578)
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 12:02:39 -0000

Hello RFC Errara System,

Tuesday, January 5, 2016, 2:42:45 AM, you wrote:

> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7303,
> "XML Media Types".

I believe that the original text is correct, because W3C is change
controller not only of the +xml suffic but also of application/xml and
related types.

Henry, do you agree?

> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7303&eid=4578

> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Martin Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>

> Section: 4.2

> Original Text
> -------------
> In addition to the changes described above, the change controller has
> been changed to be the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C).


> Corrected Text
> --------------
> In addition to the changes described above, the change controller for
> the '+xml' Structured Syntax Suffix has been changed to be the World
> Wide Web Consortium (W3C).


> Notes
> -----
> At
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lager/hRVFkda9GKFTYeBcmK2Ge9OdvoA,
> the sentence was misread to apply to all registrations with a +xml
> suffix, rather than only to the registration of the suffix itself.

> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

> --------------------------------------
> RFC7303 (draft-ietf-appsawg-xml-mediatypes-10)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : XML Media Types
> Publication Date    : July 2014
> Author(s)           : H. Thompson, C. Lilley
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Applications Area Working Group APP
> Area                : Applications
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG




-- 
Best regards,
 Chris  Lilley
 Technical Director, W3C Interaction Domain