[apps-discuss] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6365 (4005)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 04 June 2014 20:33 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D86121A02F0 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 13:33:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.553
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.553 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n-IXJEdMOwod for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 13:33:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::31]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AE251A0085 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 13:33:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 36E7F18000D; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 13:32:55 -0700 (PDT)
To: paul.hoffman@vpnc.org, john+ietf@jck.com, barryleiba@computer.org, presnick@qti.qualcomm.com, superuser@gmail.com, Salvatore.Loreto@ericsson.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 6000:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20140604203255.36E7F18000D@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 13:32:55 -0700
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/wPMI2NZnhs_IcxsaXfyKTLT4w4o
Cc: john=ietf@jck.com, apps-discuss@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [apps-discuss] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6365 (4005)
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 20:33:59 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6365,
"Terminology Used in Internationalization in the IETF".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6365&eid=4005

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: John Klensin <john=ietf@jck.com>

Section: GLOBAL

Original Text
-------------
US-ASCII

Corrected Text
--------------
ASCII

Notes
-----
The term "US-ASCII" is an IETF artifact, left over from some misunderstandings about what "ASCII" referred to (and the complete absence of CSCII or CASCII, MSCII or MXSCII, BRSCII, ARSCII, and other "American" coded character sets).  It is a source of confusion for people who come to IETF specifications with a background in coded character sets and terminology from other areas or standards bodies and has been warned against multiple times.  It should not have appeared in this document except possibly with a warning against its use (and the use of other bogus terms like "ASCII7").  The second author, who is normally sensitive to the issue, has no idea how this got past him, even in text picked up from other documents, but supposes this is what errata are for.

In any event, there is no such thing as "US-ASCII": the term is an erroneous and misleading synonym/ substitute for "ASCII".  The reference for the latter is correct, but the citation anchor should probably be corrected as well.

Instructions:
-------------
This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC6365 (draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3536bis-06)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Terminology Used in Internationalization in the IETF
Publication Date    : September 2011
Author(s)           : P. Hoffman, J. Klensin
Category            : BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
Source              : Applications Area Working Group
Area                : Applications
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG