IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7386 (4132)

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Wed, 15 October 2014 23:39 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA0961ACE79 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 16:39:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.15
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.15 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aV-if-We9ruW for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 16:39:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 850A71ACC82 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 16:39:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.224.120]) by mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9FNddx8011431; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 01:39:40 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.217.145] (p5489134F.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.137.19.79]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B829BB45; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 01:39:38 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <306B15D1-D5F5-46B8-8473-599B3B4667EE@tzi.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 01:39:37 +0200
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 435109176.937935-20bcc2b09e45aa53a9739204ac0085d6
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B4348A79-D3F5-4113-9B1D-B2C141E7765B@tzi.org>
References: <20141015183752.37123181C73@rfc-editor.org> <255B9BB34FB7D647A506DC292726F6E127CF275517@WSMSG3153V.srv.dir.telstra.com> <306B15D1-D5F5-46B8-8473-599B3B4667EE@tzi.org>
To: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/yXas0zcO3vmrp3P7Oj57wJjp8-w
Cc: "presnick@qti.qualcomm.com" <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, "barryleiba@computer.org" <barryleiba@computer.org>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7386 (4132)
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 23:39:46 -0000

(Trimming cc list:)

This is now also
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/trac/ticket/276

Grüße, Carsten

On 16 Oct 2014, at 01:16, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:

> On 16 Oct 2014, at 01:06, Manger, James <James.H.Manger@team.telstra.com> wrote:
> 
>> P.S. Curiously, the "Diff2" format on tools.ietf.org [https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=rfc7386] shows the indentation as being correct in rfc7386.txt and draft-ietf-appsawg-json-merge-patch-07. Probably a tools glitch.
> 
> This looks like the canonical tab-width confusion.
> The correct text had a tab-width of 8, but the RFC text was converted to spaces applying a tab-width of 4.
> 
> Yep, the copy of rfc7386.xml I have has been tabified, while draft-ietf-appsawg-json-merge-patch-07.xml is clean.
> 
> NEVER, EVER, tabify documents.
> THROW OUT ALL TOOLS THAT DO THIS.
> (Sorry for shouting, but this TAB nonsense has cost too much time in my life already.)
> 
> Grüße, Carsten
> 
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email