[APPS-REVIEW] Names to Nomcom

Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com> Wed, 22 October 2008 13:49 UTC

Return-Path: <apps-review-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: apps-review-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-apps-review-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94E663A6BA4; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 06:49:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: apps-review@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-review@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A02323A6B97 for <apps-review@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 06:49:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.573
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.573 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.026, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E6HKglT0rD+b for <apps-review@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 06:49:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gs19.inmotionhosting.com (gs19b.inmotionhosting.com [66.117.3.189]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C44CF3A6BA2 for <apps-review@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 06:49:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [75.68.119.237] (port=62157 helo=[192.168.15.103]) by gs19.inmotionhosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from <eburger@standardstrack.com>) id 1Kse6l-0005JL-0H for apps-review@ietf.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 06:50:43 -0700
Message-Id: <B1AF1484-C022-4787-BDAD-8BF02DD04A19@standardstrack.com>
From: Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com>
To: apps-review@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2)
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:50:42 -0400
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2)
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - gs19.inmotionhosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - standardstrack.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Subject: [APPS-REVIEW] Names to Nomcom
X-BeenThere: apps-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications Review List <apps-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/apps-review>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1820551193=="
Sender: apps-review-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: apps-review-bounces@ietf.org

Nomcom has the mail list. I did not realize nomcom had special super- 
secret IETF dispensation for warrant-less secret information  
disclosure. Ooops - sorry I let folks know they are subject to  
investigation by Nomcom. Sorry again - that was  a U.S.-centric  
political statement ;-)

I guess nomcom has special investigative powers that are not well  
publicized. I couldn't find the section analogous to the Patriot Act's  
secret data capture provisions in RFC 3777...

I suppose we should amend "Note Well" to include "Subscribing to an  
IETF mail list may subject your e-mail address for IETF-only internal  
use, beyond the mail list you have subscribed to. Trust us - it is for  
your own benefit. Really."

IMHO, this particular use really is for our benefit, but I'm massively  
worried about the slippery slope we're sliding down.

Regards,
Your way too paranoid for his own good list manager,
Eric
_______________________________________________
APPS-REVIEW mailing list
APPS-REVIEW@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-review