Re: [APPS-REVIEW] Names to Nomcom

Eric Burger wrote:

> Nomcom has the mail list. I did not realize nomcom had special super- 
> secret IETF dispensation for warrant-less secret information  
> disclosure. Ooops - sorry I let folks know they are subject to  
> investigation by Nomcom. Sorry again - that was  a U.S.-centric  
> political statement ;-)
>
> I guess nomcom has special investigative powers that are not well  
> publicized. I couldn't find the section analogous to the Patriot 
> Act's  secret data capture provisions in RFC 3777...
>
> I suppose we should amend "Note Well" to include "Subscribing to an  
> IETF mail list may subject your e-mail address for IETF-only internal  
> use, beyond the mail list you have subscribed to. Trust us - it is 
> for  your own benefit. Really."
>
> IMHO, this particular use really is for our benefit, but I'm 
> massively  worried about the slippery slope we're sliding down.

I agree with you. It is better to explicitly ask people.

Regarding my original reply in this thread: I think I now understand why 
you've sent out the message that started this thread, but it could have 
been clearer on why you were asking for this information.

> Regards,
> Your way too paranoid for his own good list manager,
> Eric

_______________________________________________
APPS-REVIEW mailing list
APPS-REVIEW@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-review