Re: [appsdir] Request for reviews

my small preference... :-)

If I get the assignement like we do now on appsdir, I'm certain (well... 
at least 98% certain) that I do read all assignemt messages, and I 
definitly get those assigned to me or more interesting assigned to others.
Because I read them one-by-one...

If I receive a diest, the "missing the assignmenet/document" risk is mch 
higher.

But that's because of the way I handle my email messages and work on 
them... nothing more.

SM also send summaries,... ok, they're post-mortem ones, e.g. what's been 
done during the last month. In case we feel it useful, we can send "also" 
assignment summaries; but I personally ("personally") do not see an 
advantage in doing that, and only further for for the current coordinator.

ok that's it, nothing really fundamental :-)

Claudio

On Wed, 11 Jan 2012, Tobias Gondrom wrote:

> Hi SM, hi apps-dir fellows,
>
> maybe a small proposal or question:
> I noticed the appsdir mechanism to assign documents to reviewers is different 
> to what we use in sec-dir. Please note, that this is perfectly fine with me, 
> if you choose so.
> Just wondering whether there is a specific reason or just coincidence.
> FYI, a typical sec-dir assignment email is added below.
>
> In sec-dir, all assignments are done in one email to the list (about every 
> 1-2 weeks) and this way everybody has an overview of the normal work going on 
> and look for his assignments within this one email.
>
> The current configuration in Apps-Dir (sending the review request in a batch 
> to the individual with cc to the appsdir list) makes it harder to have an 
> overview (because you have to read each assignment email individually), but 
> actually would make it very easy (i.e. tempting) to configure an incoming 
> message filter that will file everything except emails sent directly to me 
> into a folder for later reading. (Not sure whether that is the intent?)
>
> Personally I think I prefer the sec-dir approach as that way everybody in the 
> team has an overview over the drafts currently under review and possible 
> interactions, but have no strong opinion on that.
> Of course it only works if you send out assignment requests in a batch, like 
> yesterday.
>
> Any comments?
>
> Best regards, Tobias
>
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: 	[secdir] Assignments
> Date: 	Thu, 29 Dec 2011 18:25:14 -0500 (EST)
> From: 	Samuel Weiler <weiler+secdir@watson.org>
> Reply-To: 	secdir-secretary@mit.edu
> To: 	secdir@ietf.org
>
>
>
> I hope everyone had a good Christmas and has a pleasant and safe New
> Year celebration.
>
> As I observed last week, "most of the outstanding previosuly-assigned
> docs are scheduled for [the January 5th telechat]".  If you have an
> old assignment, that document is likely on the telechat next week.
>
> Only four new assignments today.  Leif Johansson is next in the
> rotation.
>
> For telechat 2012-01-05
>
> Reviewer                 LC end     Draft
> Derek Atkins           T 2012-01-06 draft-arkko-ipv6-only-experience-04
> Richard Barnes         T 2011-12-20 draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement-09
> Uri Blumenthal         T 2011-12-19 draft-ietf-storm-rddp-registries-01
> Alan DeKok             T 2011-12-05 draft-ietf-6man-exthdr-05
> Alan DeKok             T 2012-01-06 draft-yevstifeyev-disclosure-relation-00
> Donald Eastlake        T 2012-01-04 draft-ietf-6lowpan-nd-18
> Shawn Emery            T -          draft-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-applicability-04
> Tobias Gondrom         T 2012-01-04 
> draft-ietf-softwire-gateway-init-ds-lite-06
> Love Hornquist-Astrand T 2011-12-29 draft-daboo-webdav-sync-06
> Jeffrey Hutzelman      T 2011-12-26 draft-gregorio-uritemplate-07
> Tim Polk               T 2011-12-28 draft-kucherawy-dkim-atps-13
> Eric Rescorla          T 2011-12-29 draft-ohye-canonical-link-relation-04
>
>
> For telechat 2012-01-19
>
> Reviewer                 LC end     Draft
> Rob Austein            T 2012-01-11 draft-ash-gcac-algorithm-spec-03
> Phillip Hallam-Baker   T 2012-01-18 draft-jiang-a6-to-historic-00
> Jeffrey Hutzelman      T 2012-01-04 draft-ietf-marf-authfailure-report-07
> Julien Laganier        T 2011-12-15 draft-ietf-marf-redaction-03
>
> Last calls and special requests:
>
> Reviewer                 LC end     Draft
> Dave Cridland            2012-01-03 draft-os-ietf-sshfp-ecdsa-sha2-04
> Steve Hanna              2012-01-13 draft-nottingham-http-new-status-03
> Sam Hartman              2012-01-05 draft-ietf-kitten-sasl-saml-06
> Paul Hoffman             2012-01-12 draft-ietf-alto-reqs-12
> Love Hornquist-Astrand   2012-01-13 draft-ietf-pcn-signaling-requirements-07
> Tina TSOU                2011-04-23 draft-shin-augmented-pake-08
> _______________________________________________
> secdir mailing list
> secdir@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir
> wiki: http://tools.ietf.org/area/sec/trac/wiki/SecDirReview
>
>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Claudio Allocchio             G   A   R   R          Claudio.Allocchio@garr.it
                         Senior Technical Officer
tel: +39 040 3758523      Italian Academic and       G=Claudio; S=Allocchio;
fax: +39 040 3758565        Research Network         P=garr; A=garr; C=it;

            PGP Key: http://www.cert.garr.it/PGP/keys.php3#ca