Re: [appsdir] Request for reviews

Hi SM, hi apps-dir fellows,

maybe a small proposal or question:
I noticed the appsdir mechanism to assign documents to reviewers is 
different to what we use in sec-dir. Please note, that this is perfectly 
fine with me, if you choose so.
Just wondering whether there is a specific reason or just coincidence.
FYI, a typical sec-dir assignment email is added below.

In sec-dir, all assignments are done in one email to the list (about 
every 1-2 weeks) and this way everybody has an overview of the normal 
work going on and look for his assignments within this one email.

The current configuration in Apps-Dir (sending the review request in a 
batch to the individual with cc to the appsdir list) makes it harder to 
have an overview (because you have to read each assignment email 
individually), but actually would make it very easy (i.e. tempting) to 
configure an incoming message filter that will file everything except 
emails sent directly to me into a folder for later reading. (Not sure 
whether that is the intent?)

Personally I think I prefer the sec-dir approach as that way everybody 
in the team has an overview over the drafts currently under review and 
possible interactions, but have no strong opinion on that.
Of course it only works if you send out assignment requests in a batch, 
like yesterday.

Any comments?

Best regards, Tobias

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	[secdir] Assignments
Date: 	Thu, 29 Dec 2011 18:25:14 -0500 (EST)
From: 	Samuel Weiler <weiler+secdir@watson.org>
Reply-To: 	secdir-secretary@mit.edu
To: 	secdir@ietf.org

I hope everyone had a good Christmas and has a pleasant and safe New
Year celebration.

As I observed last week, "most of the outstanding previosuly-assigned
docs are scheduled for [the January 5th telechat]".  If you have an
old assignment, that document is likely on the telechat next week.

Only four new assignments today.  Leif Johansson is next in the
rotation.

For telechat 2012-01-05

Reviewer                 LC end     Draft
Derek Atkins           T 2012-01-06 draft-arkko-ipv6-only-experience-04
Richard Barnes         T 2011-12-20 draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement-09
Uri Blumenthal         T 2011-12-19 draft-ietf-storm-rddp-registries-01
Alan DeKok             T 2011-12-05 draft-ietf-6man-exthdr-05
Alan DeKok             T 2012-01-06 draft-yevstifeyev-disclosure-relation-00
Donald Eastlake        T 2012-01-04 draft-ietf-6lowpan-nd-18
Shawn Emery            T -          draft-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-applicability-04
Tobias Gondrom         T 2012-01-04 draft-ietf-softwire-gateway-init-ds-lite-06
Love Hornquist-Astrand T 2011-12-29 draft-daboo-webdav-sync-06
Jeffrey Hutzelman      T 2011-12-26 draft-gregorio-uritemplate-07
Tim Polk               T 2011-12-28 draft-kucherawy-dkim-atps-13
Eric Rescorla          T 2011-12-29 draft-ohye-canonical-link-relation-04

For telechat 2012-01-19

Reviewer                 LC end     Draft
Rob Austein            T 2012-01-11 draft-ash-gcac-algorithm-spec-03
Phillip Hallam-Baker   T 2012-01-18 draft-jiang-a6-to-historic-00
Jeffrey Hutzelman      T 2012-01-04 draft-ietf-marf-authfailure-report-07
Julien Laganier        T 2011-12-15 draft-ietf-marf-redaction-03

Last calls and special requests:

Reviewer                 LC end     Draft
Dave Cridland            2012-01-03 draft-os-ietf-sshfp-ecdsa-sha2-04
Steve Hanna              2012-01-13 draft-nottingham-http-new-status-03
Sam Hartman              2012-01-05 draft-ietf-kitten-sasl-saml-06
Paul Hoffman             2012-01-12 draft-ietf-alto-reqs-12
Love Hornquist-Astrand   2012-01-13 draft-ietf-pcn-signaling-requirements-07
Tina TSOU                2011-04-23 draft-shin-augmented-pake-08
_______________________________________________
secdir mailing list
secdir@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir
wiki: http://tools.ietf.org/area/sec/trac/wiki/SecDirReview