Re: [appsdir] [mile] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mile-enum-reference-format-08.txt

["Takeshi Takahashi" <[e-mail]>]

Hello again,

I am sorry, I have now found emails on the v8 version of the draft.
I totally agree on the comments you provided, including the comments on the IODEF v2 schema.

I should have checked the emails more carefully.
I am sorry for bothering you, please ignore my previous email.

Best regards,
Take




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Takeshi Takahashi [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: Friday, October 17, 2014 10:04 AM
> To: '[e-mail]'; '[e-mail]'; '[e-mail]';
> '[e-mail]'
> Subject: RE: [appsdir] [mile] I-D Action:
> draft-ietf-mile-enum-reference-format-08.txt
> 
> Hello all,
> 
> Thank you very much for your kind review, and I am sorry for my very late
> response.
> 
> Let me ask you a confirmation question.
> Could I take these comments as the comments against the "08 version" of
> the schema?
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mile-enum-reference-format-08
> 
> The earlier apps area review was made against the 05 version of the schema.
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mile/current/msg01458.html
> I have felt that the discussion below are on the 05 version of the draft,
> but I might be wrong. So, let me confirm.
> 
> The draft has changed the way of defining the schema totally after the 90th
> IETF meeting in Toronto, thus Eric has felt the needs to re-ask the schema
> review.
> 
> I myself have confirmed that the MSV schema validator shows no error.
> But comments from experts are very appreciated.
> 
> Thank you very much.
> 
> Kind regards,
> Take
> 
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Tim Bray <[e-mail]>
> Date: 2014-09-14 7:30 GMT+09:00
> Subject: Re: [appsdir] [mile] I-D Action:
> draft-ietf-mile-enum-reference-format-08.txt
> To: S Moonesamy <[e-mail]>
> Cc: Melnikov Alexey <[e-mail]>, [e-mail], Takeshi
> Takahashi <[e-mail]>, Claudio Allocchio
> <[e-mail]>
> 
> 
> Haha, except for I totally missed Henry’s point that the way they defined
> it you can’t actually schema-validate.  (Not surprising; I’m well known
> to have a strained relationship with all flavors of schemas for XML)
> 
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 12:45 PM, S Moonesamy <[e-mail]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Tim,
> > At 08:53 12-09-2014, Tim Bray wrote:
> >>
> >> For the existing review, and the conversation that followed it, start
> >> here:
> >> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mile/current/msg01458.html
> >
> >
> > Thanks for the link; I went to read the thread.  I'll say: nice work.
> > :-)
> >
> > Best regards,
> > -sm
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> - Tim Bray (If you’d like to send me a private message, see
> https://keybase.io/timbray)