IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [appsdir] [mile] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mile-enum-reference-format-08.txt

"Takeshi Takahashi" <takeshi_takahashi@nict.go.jp> Fri, 17 October 2014 01:04 UTC

Return-Path: <takeshi_takahashi@nict.go.jp>
X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21D961A7013 for <appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 18:04:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vOpsRiGt5oDx for <appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 18:04:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ns2.nict.go.jp (ns2.nict.go.jp [IPv6:2001:df0:232:300::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 381A21A907F for <appsdir@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 18:04:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gw2.nict.go.jp (gw2 [133.243.18.251]) by ns2.nict.go.jp with ESMTP id s9H14HFI021233; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 10:04:17 +0900 (JST)
Received: from mail1.nict.go.jp (mail.nict.go.jp [133.243.18.3]) by gw2.nict.go.jp with ESMTP id s9H14H6H017410; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 10:04:17 +0900 (JST)
Received: from mail1.nict.go.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail1.nict.go.jp (NICT Mail) with ESMTP id 4C53B16981; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 10:04:17 +0900 (JST)
Received: from TakeVaioVJP13 (unknown [133.243.28.216]) by mail1.nict.go.jp (NICT Mail) with ESMTP id 3E7481697D; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 10:04:17 +0900 (JST)
From: Takeshi Takahashi <takeshi_takahashi@nict.go.jp>
To: sm+ietf@elandsys.com, aamelnikov@gmail.com, appsdir@ietf.org, Claudio.Allocchio@garr.it
References: <20140906114511.29099.63218.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <642EC1AE-F8D9-4361-8F8D-F6C92BA1592A@standardstrack.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20140911100843.0b0153c8@elandnews.com> <CAHBU6iu6XCqLL+R0WvmtrrZp+=uMhpaicoZd4PGr4Uzkm+nN5A@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20140912080814.0e85c760@elandnews.com> <CAHBU6itJc2+BbjhJ320XPjzuicf0Dv=t=csBMDTG21WyuSDQ0g@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20140912123842.0e452588@elandnews.com> <CAHBU6itPNasCYtK5hws7tBRmpcDL1wB3TLCHGLLN5KkhNUtGkg@mail.gmail.com> <CAMA4c9V0Rz_TPuY5=ksquowbtWeNvkioV3D2JTE9Ln=u+VcUYA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMA4c9V0Rz_TPuY5=ksquowbtWeNvkioV3D2JTE9Ln=u+VcUYA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 10:04:23 +0900
Message-ID: <001401cfe9a6$49f30520$ddd90f60$@nict.go.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0
Thread-Index: AQGPpXGqXuEcO4I7Y4tekXcz1kHBmQE1nhmnAgl7zSABcuxB8wHx8ZYeApzUyG8C8qxn7gIi4aXYAYTaocacNSRE4A==
Content-Language: ja
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.8 at zenith2
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/appsdir/tVw52LL59P9UoDTe8HX16GIw7zc
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 21:35:18 -0700
Subject: Re: [appsdir] [mile] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mile-enum-reference-format-08.txt
X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Apps Area Review List <appsdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/appsdir>, <mailto:appsdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/appsdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:appsdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:appsdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/appsdir>, <mailto:appsdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 01:04:57 -0000

Hello all,

Thank you very much for your kind review, and I am sorry for my very late response.

Let me ask you a confirmation question.
Could I take these comments as the comments against the "08 version" of the schema?
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mile-enum-reference-format-08

The earlier apps area review was made against the 05 version of the schema.
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mile/current/msg01458.html
I have felt that the discussion below are on the 05 version of the draft, but I might be wrong. So, let me confirm.

The draft has changed the way of defining the schema totally after the 90th IETF meeting in Toronto, thus Eric has felt the needs to re-ask the schema review.

I myself have confirmed that the MSV schema validator shows no error.
But comments from experts are very appreciated.

Thank you very much.

Kind regards,
Take


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: 2014-09-14 7:30 GMT+09:00
Subject: Re: [appsdir] [mile] I-D Action:
draft-ietf-mile-enum-reference-format-08.txt
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Cc: Melnikov Alexey <aamelnikov@gmail.com>, appsdir@ietf.org, Takeshi Takahashi <takeshi_takahashi@nict.go.jp>, Claudio Allocchio <Claudio.Allocchio@garr.it>


Haha, except for I totally missed Henry’s point that the way they defined it you can’t actually schema-validate.  (Not surprising; I’m well known to have a strained relationship with all flavors of schemas for XML)

On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 12:45 PM, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Tim,
> At 08:53 12-09-2014, Tim Bray wrote:
>>
>> For the existing review, and the conversation that followed it, start 
>> here:  
>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mile/current/msg01458.html
>
>
> Thanks for the link; I went to read the thread.  I'll say: nice work. 
> :-)
>
> Best regards,
> -sm




--
- Tim Bray (If you’d like to send me a private message, see
https://keybase.io/timbray)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email