Re: [appsdir] AppsDir review of draft-farrresnickel-ipr-sanctions
Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Tue, 22 May 2012 19:32 UTC
Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1C6521F8577; Tue, 22 May 2012 12:32:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.835
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.835 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.142, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z+soZHA0LuDL; Tue, 22 May 2012 12:32:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gg0-f172.google.com (mail-gg0-f172.google.com [209.85.161.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1841521F851B; Tue, 22 May 2012 12:32:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ggnc4 with SMTP id c4so6799664ggn.31 for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 22 May 2012 12:32:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=gp/N0Q4tNHKFyx5eIvEMpP7nLqQEnxWQdJeBOoWD2wI=; b=U8CZC4ZshJ0w1gZY2pfeZgOA9wu9CB60gMHaQmnsULwjtMkoTH5o3A4s2OMNj8DNxD vzZ2O6JK0CFa34niSRhNA/KBBnosTgCfi4EEQNXkOftg5M43yzZuIDz6FNI/mvg32d8n 9pn96eQecp6yXcelJ3SscgrWGWAtGy3M1BBxDNwgOU3llBm1sgv1UPCidCNbljygvez/ 9A6E4PkuGA7kpuVFA+3K2SqGt0P+I149l1DbzcP5Q3nWxb0Y+aMTHnRU3md6Xx019MMI zsZhUMxWwcOVHYdA9J0LY1V5GGBn45do4/cLSEyXkKfZUledZD2jo/E04aB1Cp+Z+qwi Es4Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.60.4.165 with SMTP id l5mr23584967oel.41.1337715154367; Tue, 22 May 2012 12:32:34 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: barryleiba@gmail.com
Received: by 10.60.10.68 with HTTP; Tue, 22 May 2012 12:32:34 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E00392812C442@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E00392812C442@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 15:32:34 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: zSYBJRUHefp4ncoXvsv53KpcsAM
Message-ID: <CALaySJLv=eY4f6sX+kLEuCSPnNXiu_pna08Kg+05y9c=1bFv6g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "draft-farrresnickel-ipr-sanctions.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-farrresnickel-ipr-sanctions.all@tools.ietf.org>, "appsdir@ietf.org" <appsdir@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [appsdir] AppsDir review of draft-farrresnickel-ipr-sanctions
X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Apps Area Review List <appsdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/appsdir>, <mailto:appsdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/appsdir>
List-Post: <mailto:appsdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:appsdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/appsdir>, <mailto:appsdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 19:32:35 -0000
> 1. Should this not be a BCP? The polk draft describes ways to encourage > compliance, while this one talks about penalties for non-compliance. That > seems too severe for Informational status, while the polk draft can probably > get away with it. I'm pretty sure this one should NOT be a BCP. Remember that it doesn't change ANY procedure or process. It just points out alternatives that are already available. Barry
- [appsdir] AppsDir review of draft-farrresnickel-i… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [appsdir] AppsDir review of draft-farrresnick… Barry Leiba
- Re: [appsdir] AppsDir review of draft-farrresnick… Adrian Farrel