Re: [appsdir] [apps-discuss] Review of: draft-ietf-decade-problem-statement-05
Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Thu, 22 March 2012 19:25 UTC
Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 506E321F8577 for <appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 12:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EC1+vkN+spc5 for <appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 12:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D9C921F8578 for <appsdir@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 12:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.8.65] (ter75-1-81-57-68-77.fbx.proxad.net [81.57.68.77]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q2MJOeQs024444 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 22 Mar 2012 12:25:05 -0700
Message-ID: <4F6B7C75.2080503@dcrocker.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 20:24:37 +0100
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: SM <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
References: <4F6A96A5.3070608@bbiw.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20120322104321.0acb4930@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20120322104321.0acb4930@resistor.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Thu, 22 Mar 2012 12:25:06 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: appsdir@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [appsdir] [apps-discuss] Review of: draft-ietf-decade-problem-statement-05
X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: Apps Area Review List <appsdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/appsdir>, <mailto:appsdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/appsdir>
List-Post: <mailto:appsdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:appsdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/appsdir>, <mailto:appsdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 19:25:18 -0000
On 3/22/2012 6:54 PM, SM wrote: > Hi Dave, > > Thanks for performing the two draft-ietf-decade- reviews. Carsten reviewed > draft-ietf-decade-arch-04 two months ago ( > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/current/msg04174.html ). From a quick read, it looks as if Carsten's opinion of that document matches mine for the one's I read. Unfortunately, this working group appears to have spent 2 years to produce inconsistent work that tends to surface issues only, IMO. Worse is that I think the goal they want to work towards would be useful to achieve... d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net