Re: [aqm] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-aqm-pie-07: (with COMMENT)

"Rong Pan (ropan)" <ropan@cisco.com> Tue, 24 May 2016 00:32 UTC

Return-Path: <ropan@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8498512B00D; Mon, 23 May 2016 17:32:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.947
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.947 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GnHfCm_cmX0n; Mon, 23 May 2016 17:32:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 356BE12D529; Mon, 23 May 2016 17:32:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=749; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1464049965; x=1465259565; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=WuDInoUl3n9k0dVdO7MjpmndG/MyA4GEcIlPApFerJ4=; b=I34/TRnx3xRtw57Hj3uslpjJaFZp4q3wzpc5E5XmvO9NRXczWuHGfqa9 O8dbMtnKHRd/icvkozrft3Qs05o8XxzHwH/NLUlYhsmC2RMX4mHAExzGZ P8cdZbM4xz9Wlh0hQ/+XrmejOM9JPmpAJUrCTeCJUXBO8rde2B4c4CkZa k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DxBQDon0NX/49dJa1cgzeBWbdvgh2BdoYRAoE3OhIBAQEBAQEBZSeEQwEBBHkQAgEIRjIlAgQBDYgzAcQAAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBH4YnhE2KGQEEiASGGYoaAY4fgWmET4hkj0sBJwM4g22JQAF+AQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,358,1459814400"; d="scan'208";a="275191732"
Received: from rcdn-core-7.cisco.com ([173.37.93.143]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 May 2016 00:32:44 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-017.cisco.com (xch-rcd-017.cisco.com [173.37.102.27]) by rcdn-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u4O0WiW2011205 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 24 May 2016 00:32:44 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-017.cisco.com (173.36.7.27) by XCH-RCD-017.cisco.com (173.37.102.27) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Mon, 23 May 2016 19:32:43 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-017.cisco.com ([173.36.7.27]) by XCH-ALN-017.cisco.com ([173.36.7.27]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Mon, 23 May 2016 19:32:43 -0500
From: "Rong Pan (ropan)" <ropan@cisco.com>
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-aqm-pie-07: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHRsWtGl1dol5TfC0OorepJuBAqk5/HIzAA
Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 00:32:43 +0000
Message-ID: <D368EE91.18841%ropan@cisco.com>
References: <20160519011042.14660.75883.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20160519011042.14660.75883.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.6.2.160219
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [171.71.130.224]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <C3EB00E59649204EA2CDFB1535E557F8@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aqm/6q48Ft21bWWlPGP1dcIZ5FDi1cU>
Cc: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>, "draft-ietf-aqm-pie@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-aqm-pie@ietf.org>, "aqm-chairs@ietf.org" <aqm-chairs@ietf.org>, "aqm@ietf.org" <aqm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [aqm] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-aqm-pie-07: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/aqm/>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 00:32:46 -0000

I am not sure how to address the following.

Instead of ³SHOULD², what would be a good alternative word?

Regarding ³experimental², Chair, Mirja, what would be the best way to
address?

Thanks,

Rong

>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>COMMENT:
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>In section 5 and its children: Please keep in mind that "SHOULD" does not
>mean quite the same thing as "optional".
>
>It would be nice to see some text about the nature of the "experiment".
>That is, why is this experimental? Do you expect to promote this to a
>standard in the future? (The shepherd's report speaks of this;  the draft
>should, too.)
>
>