[aqm] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-aqm-pie-07: (with COMMENT)

"Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> Thu, 19 May 2016 01:10 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietf.org
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09C0312D106; Wed, 18 May 2016 18:10:43 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.20.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20160519011042.14660.75883.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 18:10:42 -0700
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aqm/Lr2wPiK3BYXoK4nBWudPmr8MSG0>
Cc: wes@mti-systems.com, draft-ietf-aqm-pie@ietf.org, aqm-chairs@ietf.org, aqm@ietf.org
Subject: [aqm] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-aqm-pie-07: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/aqm/>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 01:10:43 -0000

Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-aqm-pie-07: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-aqm-pie/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

In section 5 and its children: Please keep in mind that "SHOULD" does not
mean quite the same thing as "optional".

It would be nice to see some text about the nature of the "experiment".
That is, why is this experimental? Do you expect to promote this to a
standard in the future? (The shepherd's report speaks of this;  the draft
should, too.)