IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [aqm] updated draft agenda / PIE & CableLabs

"LAUTENSCHLAEGER, WOLFRAM (WOLFRAM)" <wolfram.lautenschlaeger@alcatel-lucent.com> Tue, 25 February 2014 06:43 UTC

Return-Path: <wolfram.lautenschlaeger@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 095961A0319 for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 22:43:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9fbyQ5VYk2py for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 22:43:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hoemail2.alcatel.com (hoemail2.alcatel.com [192.160.6.149]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC4FA1A023F for <aqm@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 22:43:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (h135-239-2-42.lucent.com [135.239.2.42]) by hoemail2.alcatel.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id s1P6hCFs026810 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 25 Feb 2014 00:43:13 -0600 (CST)
Received: from FR711WXCHHUB02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.112]) by fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id s1P6hA8q027656 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 25 Feb 2014 07:43:11 +0100
Received: from FR712WXCHMBA13.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.5.165]) by FR711WXCHHUB02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.112]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 07:43:11 +0100
From: "LAUTENSCHLAEGER, WOLFRAM (WOLFRAM)" <wolfram.lautenschlaeger@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no>, "Scheffenegger, Richard" <rs@netapp.com>
Thread-Topic: [aqm] updated draft agenda / PIE & CableLabs
Thread-Index: AQHPMXKbQlGcxSrOC0iI5TORsmQQDprFhl5Q
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 06:43:10 +0000
Message-ID: <0A452E1DADEF254C9A7AC1969B878128053BA0@FR712WXCHMBA13.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <012C3117EDDB3C4781FD802A8C27DD4F26086E2D@SACEXCMBX02-PRD.hq.netapp.com> <A35D39DD-EDC2-4759-8A9B-087FDF6D8776@ifi.uio.no>
In-Reply-To: <A35D39DD-EDC2-4759-8A9B-087FDF6D8776@ifi.uio.no>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: de-DE
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.38]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aqm/BmXsGiApJv0OgYGKXyIlff6eOH8
Cc: Greg White <g.white@CableLabs.com>, Lars Eggert <lars@netapp.com>, "aqm@ietf.org list" <aqm@ietf.org>, Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [aqm] updated draft agenda / PIE & CableLabs
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aqm/>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 06:43:20 -0000

That's OK for me!

Wolfram

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: aqm [mailto:aqm-bounces@ietf.org] Im Auftrag von Michael Welzl
Gesendet: Montag, 24. Februar 2014 16:09
An: Scheffenegger, Richard
Cc: LAUTENSCHLAEGER, WOLFRAM (WOLFRAM); Greg White; Lars Eggert; aqm@ietf.org list; Ralph Droms
Betreff: Re: [aqm] updated draft agenda / PIE & CableLabs

Ok, this is getting confusing, with two talks (also the one by Wolfram Lautenschlaeger) that were mentioned as *maybe* happening in AQM, depending on whether time permits, and else maybe going to ICCRG, when ICCRG is in fact scheduled *before* AQM.

So here's a proposal. We give both Wolfram (who we already agreed with about that, in fact) and Greg a 20 minute slot each in ICCRG, to present more details. Then, if time permits, *in addition* they *may* get a 10-minute chance in AQM.

Is that a plan?  Greg, this would mean that you'll *definitely* also present to ICCRG. ok?

Cheers,
Michael


On 24. feb. 2014, at 13:19, "Scheffenegger, Richard" <rs@netapp.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> In order for Greg to give a quick overview of the changes between PIE and the variant adopted by CableLabs for DOCSIS 3.1, a tentative slot was added to the preliminary agenda.
> 
> For those interested in a more full discussion, there might be a slot at ICCRG (preceding the AQM slot), where Greg could have a longer proper slot for the presentation of that variant of PIE.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> 
> Richard Scheffenegger
> 
> 
> AQM Agenda
> IETF 89 in London, United Kingdom
> Tuesday, March 4, 2013, 14:20-15:50 BST (Sovereign)
> ******************************************************
> 
> WG status
> ---------
> 
> 14:20
> Agenda bashing
> AQM status
> Chairs
> 10 min
> 
> 
> WG items
> --------
> 
> 14:30
> draft-ietf-aqm-recommendation
> Fred Baker / Gorry Fairhurst
> 10 min 
> 
> 
> Charter items
> -------------
> 
> 14:40
> draft-welzl-ecn-benefits
> Gorry Fairhurst/Michael Welzl
> 15 min
> 
> 14:55
> draft-kuhn-aqm-eval-guidelines
> Nicolas Kuhn et. al.
> 45 min
> 
> 
> if time permits:
> 
> Algorithm Proposals
> -------------------
> 
> 15:40
> draft-lauten-aqm-gsp
> Wolfram Lautenschlaeger
> 10 min
> 
> 15:45
> draft-white-aqm-docsis-pie
> Greg White
> 10 min
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aqm mailing list
> aqm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm

_______________________________________________
aqm mailing list
aqm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email