IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [aqm] updated draft agenda / PIE & CableLabs

Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no> Mon, 24 February 2014 15:10 UTC

Return-Path: <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B82A1A00AE for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 07:10:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.253
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.253 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0VQ0bbA51I4m for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 07:10:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-out1.uio.no (mail-out1.uio.no [IPv6:2001:700:100:10::57]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A223E1A00B7 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 07:10:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-mx1.uio.no ([129.240.10.29]) by mail-out1.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.75) (envelope-from <michawe@ifi.uio.no>) id 1WHxAg-0007d8-LN; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 16:10:18 +0100
Received: from 089144238033.atnat0047.highway.bob.at ([89.144.238.33] helo=[192.168.1.4]) by mail-mx1.uio.no with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) user michawe (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <michawe@ifi.uio.no>) id 1WHxAa-0005Mq-Nh; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 16:10:18 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
In-Reply-To: <012C3117EDDB3C4781FD802A8C27DD4F26086E2D@SACEXCMBX02-PRD.hq.netapp.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 16:09:16 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A35D39DD-EDC2-4759-8A9B-087FDF6D8776@ifi.uio.no>
References: <012C3117EDDB3C4781FD802A8C27DD4F26086E2D@SACEXCMBX02-PRD.hq.netapp.com>
To: "Scheffenegger, Richard" <rs@netapp.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
X-UiO-SPF-Received:
X-UiO-Ratelimit-Test: rcpts/h 7 msgs/h 2 sum rcpts/h 12 sum msgs/h 5 total rcpts 12845 max rcpts/h 44 ratelimit 0
X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-5.0, required=5.0, autolearn=disabled, UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL=-5, uiobl=NO, uiouri=NO)
X-UiO-Scanned: B5363C110017312806D5478F5A4703529351BC5E
X-UiO-SPAM-Test: remote_host: 89.144.238.33 spam_score: -49 maxlevel 80 minaction 2 bait 0 mail/h: 2 total 7 max/h 5 blacklist 0 greylist 0 ratelimit 0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aqm/zqZis8kBBVUC-8rrh3IgTBaBN4c
Cc: "LAUTENSCHLAEGER, WOLFRAM (WOLFRAM)" <wolfram.lautenschlaeger@alcatel-lucent.com>, Greg White <g.white@CableLabs.com>, Lars Eggert <lars@netapp.com>, "aqm@ietf.org list" <aqm@ietf.org>, Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [aqm] updated draft agenda / PIE & CableLabs
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aqm/>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 15:10:34 -0000

Ok, this is getting confusing, with two talks (also the one by Wolfram Lautenschlaeger) that were mentioned as *maybe* happening in AQM, depending on whether time permits, and else maybe going to ICCRG, when ICCRG is in fact scheduled *before* AQM.

So here's a proposal. We give both Wolfram (who we already agreed with about that, in fact) and Greg a 20 minute slot each in ICCRG, to present more details. Then, if time permits, *in addition* they *may* get a 10-minute chance in AQM.

Is that a plan?  Greg, this would mean that you'll *definitely* also present to ICCRG. ok?

Cheers,
Michael


On 24. feb. 2014, at 13:19, "Scheffenegger, Richard" <rs@netapp.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> In order for Greg to give a quick overview of the changes between PIE and the variant adopted by CableLabs for DOCSIS 3.1, a tentative slot was added to the preliminary agenda.
> 
> For those interested in a more full discussion, there might be a slot at ICCRG (preceding the AQM slot), where Greg could have a longer proper slot for the presentation of that variant of PIE.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> 
> Richard Scheffenegger
> 
> 
> AQM Agenda
> IETF 89 in London, United Kingdom
> Tuesday, March 4, 2013, 14:20-15:50 BST (Sovereign)
> ******************************************************
> 
> WG status
> ---------
> 
> 14:20
> Agenda bashing
> AQM status
> Chairs
> 10 min
> 
> 
> WG items
> --------
> 
> 14:30
> draft-ietf-aqm-recommendation
> Fred Baker / Gorry Fairhurst
> 10 min 
> 
> 
> Charter items
> -------------
> 
> 14:40
> draft-welzl-ecn-benefits
> Gorry Fairhurst/Michael Welzl
> 15 min
> 
> 14:55
> draft-kuhn-aqm-eval-guidelines
> Nicolas Kuhn et. al.
> 45 min
> 
> 
> if time permits:
> 
> Algorithm Proposals
> -------------------
> 
> 15:40
> draft-lauten-aqm-gsp
> Wolfram Lautenschlaeger
> 10 min
> 
> 15:45
> draft-white-aqm-docsis-pie
> Greg White
> 10 min
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aqm mailing list
> aqm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email