IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [aqm] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-aqm-fq-codel-05: (with COMMENT)

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Thu, 17 March 2016 01:25 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57DB712D648; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 18:25:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.35
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.35 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iSbI6tGJMa77; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 18:25:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x22a.google.com (mail-yw0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4EF012D5CC; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 18:25:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id g127so83267112ywf.2; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 18:25:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc; bh=pUZyxOjim4jbCM8WaGIEO+bxCrBD+iY83TJMsqIcqKE=; b=y5lEolSORxa7e9xQ43fNTZFehk5Af1hGeFSh6EZ9Zbf6/cqQHlbHDuLMFmLwdd8aIZ Dk26lV7tRZDyCjrDjvN3/9JxFxP4+w3+dV0OYcAxAx4WgPYfu4xWZDJpE3+zLP5G2oF8 U0u1a5mJd1JcB5XNdsjSDcLVhGEUisw5rZ2qQwjnys9HWwTEovmvS8Fb6yzlSQDLs4GG JmxdRs7HwZmncmuHd0PJjPbX4UBWvXiYIfn/NXTo9GpIxhW/IR2zF27SwTRBglIrAXMi OfUIyTp0YkvZ+Mtk7KF9YrLtKPJb07K/4M43jBNjmngretV016mDhoxEFZt6W5n0rBtO EIUg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=pUZyxOjim4jbCM8WaGIEO+bxCrBD+iY83TJMsqIcqKE=; b=Acmiwa4lXJ89YAUnrhB29Ir42+JSHtuk2kIBbN7xPOOgEEVDMh9nX2OtWRkjm7LJ3t hnaveuA4y3jTO9nsOEvUYTPAHf4ZpZuf0kB6kCczXinDppvQ8IOD60W5VhRyl/rksd2g WR1qhNQiEeu3zTY/CaIaC9d7wluwWgyUHdkM2+1XsIFR1c3Gt8yS9fiuPGPjujky1VMd +d6Kw1zeG3vX8dLmTN5hjjVzL/HH5c/TNlQQ49kQGzYXtAejTrGih/djyAjDeUNV9nfD GkUyAUxZURBJx2b9YZfszYQMXXdQma83FkLyVOlCQU0is6Y9qtzGiyTxBAbhkeEPU9gK 1//g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJOKDOcJCNY/kg5Q2/NJczNrHtQU978aVZMzcwGrKuZYHK7UkwIrD1nNd6c0EK8xQkF1ysisfe8Khu9sw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.13.214.86 with SMTP id y83mr2824232ywd.227.1458177943950; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 18:25:43 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: barryleiba@gmail.com
Received: by 10.83.78.193 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 18:25:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20160317002541.15492.5207.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20160317002541.15492.5207.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 21:25:43 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: x4F4JFNd7QOzV_dbffJb_srER_Y
Message-ID: <CALaySJKtCgzCk7M0pM++8ofJfCdD+pmP2kNpk=nk4X4Qa0wFTA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aqm/OPsd2faDIWzvklwyteXMN31Rve0>
Cc: draft-ietf-aqm-fq-codel@ietf.org, wes@mti-systems.com, Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>, aqm-chairs@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, aqm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [aqm] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-aqm-fq-codel-05: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/aqm/>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 01:25:49 -0000

> - Is the following really necessary:
>
>    In this document, these words will appear with that interpretation
>    only when in ALL CAPS.  Lower case uses of these words are not to be
>    interpreted as carrying [RFC2119] significance.

Well, "necessary" is probably an overstatement, but there are some who
think that because 2119 says that the key words are "often
capitalized", but not that they always are, "should" means the same as
"SHOULD", and the former is also a 2119 key word.  Others of us don't
think that.  What's one to do?

So those two sentences make it explicitly clear what the intent is in
this document.  It's probably not "really necessary", but some find it
useful, and I, at least, have no objection to it.

Barry

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email