IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [aqm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-aqm-recommendation-07.txt

Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com> Mon, 11 August 2014 14:08 UTC

Return-Path: <wes@mti-systems.com>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AF891A01A5 for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 07:08:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GbA7tYnNry85 for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 07:08:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from atl4mhob11.myregisteredsite.com (atl4mhob11.myregisteredsite.com [209.17.115.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 225B01A03D0 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 07:08:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailpod.hostingplatform.com ([10.30.71.204]) by atl4mhob11.myregisteredsite.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s7BE8qQX001979 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 10:08:52 -0400
Received: (qmail 6899 invoked by uid 0); 11 Aug 2014 14:08:52 -0000
X-TCPREMOTEIP: 69.81.143.143
X-Authenticated-UID: wes@mti-systems.com
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.108?) (wes@mti-systems.com@69.81.143.143) by 0 with ESMTPA; 11 Aug 2014 14:08:52 -0000
Message-ID: <53E8CE68.5090004@mti-systems.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 10:08:40 -0400
From: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
Organization: MTI Systems
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk, Bob Briscoe <bob.briscoe@bt.com>
References: <20140805101838.24981.28443.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <47c4f0afaec650af659401bf8a701596.squirrel@www.erg.abdn.ac.uk> <eda4a09fc0e144ed99cf9af5f41b6f26@hioexcmbx05-prd.hq.netapp.com> <201408110909.s7B99U7v020486@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk> <ff5e927945a46a39559fbb25b0ede6bc.squirrel@www.erg.abdn.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <ff5e927945a46a39559fbb25b0ede6bc.squirrel@www.erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aqm/QDzYvLoSkCJ-7OzVvg4pKR_tENQ
Cc: "Scheffenegger, Richard" <rs@netapp.com>, "aqm@ietf.org" <aqm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [aqm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-aqm-recommendation-07.txt
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aqm/>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 14:08:56 -0000

On 8/11/2014 9:45 AM, gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk wrote:
> 
>> Responsiveness is important, but I believe it is OK for unresponsive
>> flows that are small in relative terms to only be responsive at very
>> long timescales (even solely at flow set up - self-admission
>> control). This even applies to aggregates of unresponsive flows,
>> because they will tend to be deployed where even the aggregate is
>> small relative to the link capacity.
>> See http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pwe3-congcons-02.pdf
>> (comments to the PWE3 list pls).
> 
> +GF: I don’t see this needed in this draft.
> 


I agree; this BCP is about AQM behavior, and not the right place to
hide recommendations or requirements on flow sources.


> +GF: I’m also considering replacing /congestive collapse/ by /congestion
> collapse/ which seems a more common term, as noted by John L.


I agree with this too.


-- 
Wes Eddy
MTI Systems

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email