[aqm] adoption call: draft-baker-aqm-sfq-implementation

Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com> Mon, 11 August 2014 14:25 UTC

Return-Path: <wes@mti-systems.com>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1EBC1A03E9 for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 07:25:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VAkewVGrBOCK for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 07:25:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from atl4mhob10.myregisteredsite.com (atl4mhob10.myregisteredsite.com [209.17.115.48]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 171191A03F2 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 07:25:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailpod.hostingplatform.com ([10.30.71.206]) by atl4mhob10.myregisteredsite.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s7BEPLII011084 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 10:25:21 -0400
Received: (qmail 1274 invoked by uid 0); 11 Aug 2014 14:25:21 -0000
X-TCPREMOTEIP: 69.81.143.143
X-Authenticated-UID: wes@mti-systems.com
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.108?) (wes@mti-systems.com@69.81.143.143) by 0 with ESMTPA; 11 Aug 2014 14:25:21 -0000
Message-ID: <53E8D248.4050509@mti-systems.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 10:25:12 -0400
From: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
Organization: MTI Systems
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "aqm@ietf.org" <aqm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aqm/0N6r1u69pZl7CUw65_sV1xhciqY
Subject: [aqm] adoption call: draft-baker-aqm-sfq-implementation
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aqm/>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 14:25:26 -0000

Based on feedback we've seen, it looks like there is significant
value in progressing draft-baker-aqm-sfq-implementation as a
working group document.

Assuming there is WG consensus and we have AD-approval, we would
like to add a milestone to develop this towards an Informational
RFC within ~6 months.

Please provide any comments, questions, support, or criticism for
adopting this within the next few weeks.

-- 
Wes Eddy
MTI Systems