Re: [aqm] adoption call: draft-baker-aqm-sfq-implementation

gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk Wed, 13 August 2014 11:43 UTC

Return-Path: <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD3E11A085C for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 04:43:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.869
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.869 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LirsJbBJWraZ for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 04:43:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spey.erg.abdn.ac.uk (spey.erg.abdn.ac.uk [139.133.204.173]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F28811A0847 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 04:43:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from www.erg.abdn.ac.uk (blake.erg.abdn.ac.uk [139.133.210.30]) by spey.erg.abdn.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EA9CA2B41E7; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 12:43:24 +0100 (BST)
Received: from 212.159.18.54 (SquirrelMail authenticated user gorry) by www.erg.abdn.ac.uk with HTTP; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 12:43:25 +0100
Message-ID: <374e024321469c38402992ae009b365b.squirrel@www.erg.abdn.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <53E8D281.8040705@mti-systems.com>
References: <53E8D248.4050509@mti-systems.com> <53E8D281.8040705@mti-systems.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 12:43:25 +0100
From: gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk
To: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.22
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aqm/g8M8AkFRI_Uqk19rXzwFzjA4FTU
Cc: "aqm@ietf.org" <aqm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [aqm] adoption call: draft-baker-aqm-sfq-implementation
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aqm/>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 11:43:28 -0000

I support this as a work-item.

Gorry

> For reference, the draft is at:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-baker-aqm-sfq-implementation-00
>
> On 8/11/2014 10:25 AM, Wesley Eddy wrote:
>> Based on feedback we've seen, it looks like there is significant
>> value in progressing draft-baker-aqm-sfq-implementation as a
>> working group document.
>>
>> Assuming there is WG consensus and we have AD-approval, we would
>> like to add a milestone to develop this towards an Informational
>> RFC within ~6 months.
>>
>> Please provide any comments, questions, support, or criticism for
>> adopting this within the next few weeks.
>>
>
>
> --
> Wes Eddy
> MTI Systems
>
> _______________________________________________
> aqm mailing list
> aqm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
>