IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [aqm] adoption call: draft-baker-aqm-sfq-implementation

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Fri, 22 August 2014 00:30 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 213381A06C1 for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 17:30:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -111.569
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-111.569 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, GB_SUMOF=1, J_CHICKENPOX_45=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_55=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZxuRZ9xChGVz for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 17:30:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A61E21A03D4 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 17:30:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=36575; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1408667428; x=1409877028; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=j2X8+tAdDT8auHV1ExNhdxPKwUCXvbiYIv2lGZI/BEo=; b=l+b56VVEDk9a7GXxBvKL5/74OXG9bWxXotEnT0W7aVjrOpYyWVsDeU+x 5sokC5vdTUX/SI3qCWrfcRJLysHQUe0189TXEtARQdS6Q3wYcXKBoaAeM YS757O4N/S95hRfz9w4tgYH78jxN2E013t0m9ef6fl2I+YnQx6ikV9B/l w=;
X-Files: draft-ietf-aqm-fq-implementation.txt, signature.asc : 33853, 195
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AiMFANSO9lOtJV2c/2dsb2JhbABZFoJ3U1cEtHqXXIdOAYENFneEBAEBAgEBGg1HCwULAgEIDgQ0MhcOAgQOBQ4NiB8IDcQEF45fCwsGAQdJB4MvgR0FhQSBDYQbgyeDUoIDgUpcgjqBb4JQgTIljQGGMoFkAhyBXGwBAYEFCBcigQcBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,376,1406592000"; d="asc'?txt'?scan'208";a="71360483"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 22 Aug 2014 00:30:27 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x13.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x13.cisco.com [173.36.12.87]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s7M0URtP032341 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 22 Aug 2014 00:30:27 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.15]) by xhc-aln-x13.cisco.com ([173.36.12.87]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 19:30:26 -0500
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
Thread-Topic: [aqm] adoption call: draft-baker-aqm-sfq-implementation
Thread-Index: AQHPvaBEaGcGQm5ljUqD4vyK34AtCA==
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 00:30:25 +0000
Message-ID: <FA0CAFF7-54F0-4F62-A138-B45548483542@cisco.com>
References: <53E8D248.4050509@mti-systems.com>
In-Reply-To: <53E8D248.4050509@mti-systems.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.19.64.114]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_75FF9696-6A82-4E33-9A2F-3927EE52BB63"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aqm/9XTRYdlFVHjH_LOzQPZKq65Yp_o
Cc: "aqm@ietf.org" <aqm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [aqm] adoption call: draft-baker-aqm-sfq-implementation
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aqm/>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 00:30:33 -0000

On Aug 11, 2014, at 7:25 AM, Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com> wrote:

> Based on feedback we've seen, it looks like there is significant
> value in progressing draft-baker-aqm-sfq-implementation as a
> working group document.
> 
> Assuming there is WG consensus and we have AD-approval, we would
> like to add a milestone to develop this towards an Informational
> RFC within ~6 months.
> 
> Please provide any comments, questions, support, or criticism for
> adopting this within the next few weeks.

FYI, Gorry and I discussed the draft off-list. What I have right now is attached.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email