[aqm] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC8033 (7108)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 18 January 2024 23:58 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89724C14CE2B; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 15:58:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.658
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.658 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BdyJ-gGL5Puq; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 15:58:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfcpa.amsl.com [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04C4BC14CE25; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 15:58:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id DB2FE18F3921; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 15:58:28 -0800 (PST)
To: g.white@cablelabs.com, ropan@cisco.com, prenatar@cisco.com, fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com, g.white@cablelabs.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: martin.h.duke@gmail.com, iesg@ietf.org, aqm@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20240118235828.DB2FE18F3921@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 15:58:28 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aqm/Su_Hz8BOoOUP7JqkloWTrMmsZMw>
Subject: [aqm] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC8033 (7108)
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/aqm/>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 23:58:33 -0000
The following errata report has been held for document update for RFC8033, "Proportional Integral Controller Enhanced (PIE): A Lightweight Control Scheme to Address the Bufferbloat Problem". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7108 -------------------------------------- Status: Held for Document Update Type: Editorial Reported by: Greg White <g.white@cablelabs.com> Date Reported: 2022-08-31 Held by: Martin Duke (IESG) Section: 5.1 & 10.2 Original Text ------------- 5.1. ECN Support PIE MAY support ECN by marking (rather than dropping) ECN-capable packets [ECN]. ... ... 10.2. Informative References ... [ECN] Briscoe, B., Kaippallimalil, J., and P. Thaler, "Guidelines for Adding Congestion Notification to Protocols that Encapsulate IP", Work in Progress, draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-encap-guidelines-07, July 2016. ... Corrected Text -------------- 5.1. ECN Support PIE MAY support ECN by marking (rather than dropping) ECN-capable packets [RFC3168]. ... ... 10.2. Informative References ... [RFC3168] Ramakrishnan, K., Floyd, S., and D. Black, "The Addition of Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) to IP", RFC 3168, DOI 10.17487/RFC3168, September 2001, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3168>. ... Notes ----- The reference provided for ECN points to the incorrect IETF document. -------------------------------------- RFC8033 (draft-ietf-aqm-pie-10) -------------------------------------- Title : Proportional Integral Controller Enhanced (PIE): A Lightweight Control Scheme to Address the Bufferbloat Problem Publication Date : February 2017 Author(s) : R. Pan, P. Natarajan, F. Baker, G. White Category : EXPERIMENTAL Source : Active Queue Management and Packet Scheduling Area : Transport Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [aqm] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC8033 (… RFC Errata System