[aqm] Comments on draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-01?

Naeem Khademi <naeem.khademi@gmail.com> Fri, 06 March 2015 15:18 UTC

Return-Path: <naeem.khademi@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC54A1ACE4F for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 07:18:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OSWa0ARHl5Ua for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 07:17:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yh0-x22c.google.com (mail-yh0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c01::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF0E51A0027 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 07:17:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by yhoa41 with SMTP id a41so29530829yho.9 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 07:17:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=bgKPlTrM7RtGMBxJfUiUUveHfoxRDb8eZBuiuUJr3As=; b=Ex3djmfdrk15r96cdXQ78+qbcffHVgwXWsoW++bZSzlXZKKt6c4HyKywwbXNcfkcr7 r+sM5ReeGlX38+HlN+c9QU2FlkpfYNjccfNpWcbWu79w7kXBP3vd/40MHccQOvEGysxm d9s+SnMa9cpO4xRM4mLcGcpDnQF9In2fMSx6s36BAwer/oAkW1ZiDuSUlBbD/PpYY8g6 1cgc7NoZbvJzxHWkDBNM0DiPEOFlvohjqqi6U3F/lbq25MkJM80fujzG+8HIwnykqJi1 RoHB4Fc0bqJkgK6/GsiwZx5+S5JsJeYNsFGQ5qzU8ijGalozwkrKP4I0pLZkcWSzuSbK zAow==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.236.97.73 with SMTP id s49mr13471438yhf.38.1425655074105; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 07:17:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.170.154.84 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 07:17:54 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 16:17:54 +0100
Message-ID: <CAEjQQ5XeVg64Z6UECbisAc4yD-fKiRcFZZY5MU117rpMSUedRg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Naeem Khademi <naeem.khademi@gmail.com>
To: "aqm@ietf.org" <aqm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c1c09a43b1750510a03084
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aqm/e2LQ5rFT5BUqpuFQ8bTy0OoZAX4>
Subject: [aqm] Comments on draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-01?
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aqm/>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2015 15:18:01 -0000

Hi all

Any comments on the newly submitted update as
draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-01 is welcomed. In the new version, we have
tried to address the issues brought up on the ML as well as the feedback we
received at the IETF-91 and have tried to incorporate them all. We have
also clarified several issues in the text making it more straightforward
and less ambiguous with regards to the "guidelines" and "scenarios". We
would like to have this document discussed on the ML preferably before the
9th March cut-off date as well as during the period prior to IETF-92.

Cheers,
Authors