Re: [aqm] Question re draft-baker-aqm-recommendations recomendation #3
Andrew Mcgregor <andrewmcgr@google.com> Thu, 02 May 2013 15:37 UTC
Return-Path: <andrewmcgr@google.com>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BD6821F8F2C for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 May 2013 08:37:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, SARE_SUB_OBFU_Q1=0.227, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YJIEGfwTCAbu for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 May 2013 08:37:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vc0-f170.google.com (mail-vc0-f170.google.com [209.85.220.170]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B032921F8EF7 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 May 2013 08:37:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vc0-f170.google.com with SMTP id gf12so605673vcb.15 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Thu, 02 May 2013 08:37:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=FBDThp88yXS49NjM+6V5jvxnXbUGjziLDRT6xxIWaeE=; b=cjhFo9LBht8SCmxvktH2pcsf4E7GI+rP4mvgNeMHhGDesN98P62kBwAnLIcou64aOy JdrTLX/Io/wjQZ3aykntbIcDZotzv8MnmUklKYvRrgyNBckOK/dOAmDMwww+v2Ec+h7O fpXudEunqDebPUCz8JCA0zBvbVK1qHbBblKeXvzCbiXutfVUAJSp8mkmxLrcJRKB4YHe C3lUgamIOnxkMgh5SJ5oMIp4KwpAnspJBW4eoddWvUwkHvSOad8wALNzvkDRDEGwAE99 j20Cimm3oSkFJF3drPX8Ai0+DsKUvkX6U/joM/1YCFECQwhioMFWj1kgu00cbq05Z5R0 vsWA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=FBDThp88yXS49NjM+6V5jvxnXbUGjziLDRT6xxIWaeE=; b=U6uVd61WfByWDP9YFFHovlmeCTwZHI0soyhj+Vw3HQ3vrowXmWY05gmzpWDihhLBCU SSjTZgUObpQIYrE6EypVj+nfC/Mj/QY/Zd0AoF/78GZXEUuPwgSIfOPyDGdx/nUkzWp2 X9eze3cztjeuzi+MZLLuFrn47I5KBNuPCZIwTChxbGgrn2OYG1lP5+XKPz4MxzkQYsoT NY4QwNhpFX2O0lhVFTGF0KTYfYrMiMbGc8FnPrD7vEhzdoD1yPtGeoGGJia8rOnHu1nO ST6qLTzsquqv1s8Pm6vH4qBfpEeiHIhks5V+xAcNKZdrpTuZ9XTkgzGQpmjM3RB0xd/j 3c+Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.27.163 with SMTP id u3mr1946067vdg.60.1367509059170; Thu, 02 May 2013 08:37:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.208.135 with HTTP; Thu, 2 May 2013 08:37:39 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553B830610@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com>
References: <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553B830610@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 03 May 2013 01:37:39 +1000
Message-ID: <CAPRuP3mSvnZ5Yq1uY_=oikcBhhKKn3u7CufPOWYyC0cjmY=b0A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andrew Mcgregor <andrewmcgr@google.com>
To: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="20cf307ca52ab3375804dbbe0377"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlchfHj+O5IMy6iLTikBK0ZJrRFRBsSKGXfIcF17VdOfdEXqvLAspoHDi0l6J/V3nni/MkfvWkguJsOnAB+vUl9Pi6ZdUjSexL/6otcD3pm9rK3isV/cQX0WJ7PV7d3UF4EphvULTd68SSl3AcVdU8l+KwVJMl4rr+LZ9JbBRB/NoXIz/NFoofP5lt48z+/ujOXEH/q
Cc: "aqm@ietf.org" <aqm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [aqm] Question re draft-baker-aqm-recommendations recomendation #3
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aqm>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 May 2013 15:37:47 -0000
Yes, that recommendation is necessary and should stand. On 3 May 2013 00:00, Fred Baker (fred) <fred@cisco.com> wrote: > Do we generally agree with the recommendation of > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-baker-aqm-recommendation-01#section-4.3? > This is the question of auto-tuning. > > > _______________________________________________ > aqm mailing list > aqm@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm > -- Andrew McGregor | SRE | andrewmcgr@google.com | +61 4 8143 7128
- [aqm] Question re draft-baker-aqm-recommendations… Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [aqm] Question re draft-baker-aqm-recommendat… Andrew Mcgregor
- Re: [aqm] Question re draft-baker-aqm-recommendat… Dave Taht