Re: [aqm] Question re draft-baker-aqm-recommendations recomendation #3

On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 8:37 AM, Andrew Mcgregor <andrewmcgr@google.com> wrote:
> Yes, that recommendation is necessary and should stand.

+1

Or perhaps strengthened:

An AQM algorithm should be enabled by default, and thus should "do no
harm" when used with its defaults.

to save me time on the review process:

section 4.4: +1

section 4.5:

4.5. TCP and SCTP congestion control algorithms SHOULD maximize their

use of available bandwidth without incurring loss or undue round

      trip delay

I don't see the need to specify TCP and SCTP here. Rather:

Congestion control algorithms SHOULD maximize their use of available
bandwidth without incurring undue loss or undue round trip delay

>
> On 3 May 2013 00:00, Fred Baker (fred) <fred@cisco.com> wrote:
>>
>> Do we generally agree with the recommendation of
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-baker-aqm-recommendation-01#section-4.3?
>> This is the question of auto-tuning.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aqm mailing list
>> aqm@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
>
>
>
>
> --
> Andrew McGregor | SRE | andrewmcgr@google.com | +61 4 8143 7128
>
> _______________________________________________
> aqm mailing list
> aqm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
>

-- 
Dave Täht

Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html