IETF Logo Mail Archive

[aqm] Question re draft-baker-aqm-recommendations recomendation #4

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Mon, 06 May 2013 14:00 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDA2D21F8A74 for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 May 2013 07:00:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.052
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.052 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.320, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, SARE_SUB_OBFU_Q1=0.227, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 63sfL28vnfUn for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 May 2013 07:00:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F159121F9130 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 May 2013 07:00:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=269; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1367848807; x=1369058407; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=5cXALaOKubYjjCpYAo3a+JW1ADg13/n6o4j1X83vTu4=; b=JQoiP/Az890PDpFSPx/TtrZmMkhLw+MawPhkUhpQxhna2QHvW1i3/5pA DyEJqhToXDIqRnWcv84mHZj4HKi4YtCLBxXfJ7eye8Pr4e0biWgarKLdq 9Z65xzOu6WZwAIpr6cPwwLShMLf5RudGdWOSzUYHfEkDWLTrVVivtVwXv s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: An4FAAC3h1GtJXG8/2dsb2JhbABQgwc3gnW8DYEEFm0HgiEBBDpRASoUQicEG4gEDKB4nm6PAIMqYQOYVJAOgw2CJw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,622,1363132800"; d="scan'208";a="206907772"
Received: from rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com ([173.37.113.188]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 06 May 2013 14:00:06 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x03.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x03.cisco.com [173.37.183.77]) by rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r46E062V023814 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <aqm@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 May 2013 14:00:06 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.125]) by xhc-rcd-x03.cisco.com ([173.37.183.77]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Mon, 6 May 2013 09:00:06 -0500
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: "aqm@ietf.org" <aqm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Question re draft-baker-aqm-recommendations recomendation #4
Thread-Index: AQHOSmIC+wKluQHy+U2FD9Rc1I8WAw==
Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 14:00:05 +0000
Message-ID: <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553B850ECE@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.19.64.116]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <70B6167C6F3B5C4EB6D2E18FD9843C49@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [aqm] Question re draft-baker-aqm-recommendations recomendation #4
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aqm>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 14:00:12 -0000

Do we generally agree with the recommendation of http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-baker-aqm-recommendation-01#section-4.4? This is the question of ensuring that AQM technologies are applicable to all Internet traffic - not just TCP, but UDP, SCTP, and so on.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email