Re: [aqm] Question re draft-baker-aqm-recommendations recomendation #4

Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com> Mon, 06 May 2013 14:36 UTC

Return-Path: <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B58C21F861B for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 May 2013 07:36:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.372
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.372 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SARE_SUB_OBFU_Q1=0.227]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OTZfxEH0vBVP for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 May 2013 07:36:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2959D21F93A3 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 May 2013 07:36:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id ASM43229; Mon, 06 May 2013 14:36:31 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) by lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Mon, 6 May 2013 15:35:28 +0100
Received: from DFWEML407-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.132) by lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Mon, 6 May 2013 15:36:29 +0100
Received: from DFWEML509-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.11.204]) by dfweml407-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.132]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.007; Mon, 6 May 2013 07:36:25 -0700
From: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>
To: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>, "aqm@ietf.org" <aqm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Question re draft-baker-aqm-recommendations recomendation #4
Thread-Index: AQHOSmIC+wKluQHy+U2FD9Rc1I8WA5j4OWCw
Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 14:36:23 +0000
Message-ID: <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F645B1856E@dfweml509-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553B850ECE@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553B850ECE@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.47.155.47]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Subject: Re: [aqm] Question re draft-baker-aqm-recommendations recomendation #4
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aqm>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 14:36:55 -0000

Agree. 

Linda

> -----Original Message-----
> From: aqm-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:aqm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Fred Baker (fred)
> Sent: Monday, May 06, 2013 9:00 AM
> To: aqm@ietf.org
> Subject: [aqm] Question re draft-baker-aqm-recommendations
> recomendation #4
> 
> Do we generally agree with the recommendation of
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-baker-aqm-recommendation-01#section-
> 4.4? This is the question of ensuring that AQM technologies are
> applicable to all Internet traffic - not just TCP, but UDP, SCTP, and
> so on.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aqm mailing list
> aqm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm