IETF Logo Mail Archive

[aqm] Question re draft-baker-aqm-recommendations recomendation #5

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Thu, 09 May 2013 14:00 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA1A021F8519 for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 May 2013 07:00:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.372
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.372 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, SARE_SUB_OBFU_Q1=0.227, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RDBBP7PHUY1k for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 May 2013 07:00:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3B3921F851C for <aqm@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 May 2013 07:00:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=340; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1368108006; x=1369317606; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=1WxLmKfI2XREvz/+lkTxdBngnkugZXcWC4twIIlmLEE=; b=gx4VstxtgK/QGvDQ/3MqB0k74remvcWOxligr7p/xIewGVFbdBwVyBIG Nt8Ffs1pTBCHrJ/XDNxkJkD2tr+IxNs9bvRW6pUBJTKEdjxLNYR5CE58e g4B8iAr96uIX9UsBHQdfjv1dso3ZGWpd7kxl83HRJNC9ebN8IeMmu7yZP Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AmgFAD6ri1GtJXHB/2dsb2JhbABSgwc3gnW9EnsWbQeCIQEEOlEBKhRCJwQbDId4DJ1Hn26Od4MsYQOYUpAPgw+CJw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,641,1363132800"; d="scan'208";a="208339325"
Received: from rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com ([173.37.113.193]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 09 May 2013 14:00:05 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com [173.36.12.85]) by rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r49E0428014804 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <aqm@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 May 2013 14:00:05 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.125]) by xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com ([173.36.12.85]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Thu, 9 May 2013 09:00:04 -0500
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: "aqm@ietf.org" <aqm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Question re draft-baker-aqm-recommendations recomendation #5
Thread-Index: AQHOTL2Bqg2y1VIi1UqHCIrhzQ5siA==
Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 14:00:04 +0000
Message-ID: <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553B8565D6@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.21.118.40]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <0B545B023D20ED4BBB30F5CCDD41141E@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [aqm] Question re draft-baker-aqm-recommendations recomendation #5
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aqm>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 14:00:10 -0000

Do we generally agree with the recommendation of http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-baker-aqm-recommendation-01#section-4.5? This is the question of TCP/SCTP Congestion Control: I would like to, as a community, recommend that it maximize throughput while minimizing delay, which is to say, do so without being overly aggressive.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email