Re: [aqm] Follow-up: PIE performance in cable modem environments
grenville armitage <garmitage@swin.edu.au> Sat, 04 May 2013 09:45 UTC
Return-Path: <garmitage@swin.edu.au>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D95021F94FD; Sat, 4 May 2013 02:45:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.668
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.668 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_AU=0.377, HOST_EQ_AU=0.327, SARE_SUB_OBFU_Q1=0.227]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B7EX5GnoMdI6; Sat, 4 May 2013 02:45:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gpo4.cc.swin.edu.au (gpo4.cc.swin.edu.au [136.186.1.33]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5840721F91F1; Sat, 4 May 2013 02:45:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [136.186.229.37] (garmitage.caia.swin.edu.au [136.186.229.37]) by gpo4.cc.swin.edu.au (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r449j2dV011176 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 4 May 2013 19:45:03 +1000
Message-ID: <5184D89E.1050000@swin.edu.au>
Date: Sat, 04 May 2013 19:45:02 +1000
From: grenville armitage <garmitage@swin.edu.au>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121107 Thunderbird/16.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
References: <CDA5A4A4.33A73%prenatar@cisco.com> <CDA99160.1166C%g.white@cablelabs.com> <CAA93jw4q0xcsb+zWdimkgxBrkSsf2-mJPZWgc8x4xJdMUJMVFg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw4q0xcsb+zWdimkgxBrkSsf2-mJPZWgc8x4xJdMUJMVFg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Greg White <g.white@cablelabs.com>, "iccrg@irtf.org" <iccrg@irtf.org>, "aqm@ietf.org" <aqm@ietf.org>, Preethi Natarajan <preethi.cis@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [aqm] Follow-up: PIE performance in cable modem environments
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aqm>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 May 2013 09:45:44 -0000
On 05/04/2013 19:09, Dave Taht wrote: [..] > Personally, I'd have liked it if the internet MTU had stayed below 580 > until the world was running universally at above 4Mbits. IP over ATM, FTW ;) cheers, gja
- Re: [aqm] [iccrg] Follow-up: PIE performance in c… John Leslie
- Re: [aqm] Follow-up: PIE performance in cable mod… Greg White
- [aqm] Follow-up: PIE performance in cable modem e… Preethi Natarajan
- Re: [aqm] Follow-up: PIE performance in cable mod… Preethi Natarajan
- Re: [aqm] Follow-up: PIE performance in cable mod… Dave Taht
- Re: [aqm] Follow-up: PIE performance in cable mod… grenville armitage
- Re: [aqm] Follow-up: PIE performance in cable mod… Greg White
- Re: [aqm] Follow-up: PIE performance in cable mod… Preethi Natarajan
- Re: [aqm] Follow-up: PIE performance in cable mod… Preethi Natarajan