IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [aqm] Question re draft-baker-aqm-recommendations recomendation #6

Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no> Mon, 13 May 2013 14:03 UTC

Return-Path: <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCE5F21F968E for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 May 2013 07:03:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.883
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.883 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-1.11, SARE_SUB_OBFU_Q1=0.227, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z+KB1G+R2EtB for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 May 2013 07:03:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-out5.uio.no (mail-out5.uio.no [IPv6:2001:700:100:10::17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D867F21F968D for <aqm@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 May 2013 07:03:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-mx2.uio.no ([129.240.10.30]) by mail-out5.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from <michawe@ifi.uio.no>) id 1UbtLe-0000cb-8s; Mon, 13 May 2013 16:03:30 +0200
Received: from boomerang.ifi.uio.no ([129.240.68.135]) by mail-mx2.uio.no with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) user michawe (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <michawe@ifi.uio.no>) id 1UbtLd-0003xZ-Uc; Mon, 13 May 2013 16:03:30 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
In-Reply-To: <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553B85A7CD@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 16:03:29 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <751419C7-7112-474E-A5B2-0D821A5F97C8@ifi.uio.no>
References: <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553B85A7CD@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com>
To: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283)
X-UiO-SPF-Received:
X-UiO-Ratelimit-Test: rcpts/h 4 msgs/h 2 sum rcpts/h 8 sum msgs/h 5 total rcpts 4235 max rcpts/h 40 ratelimit 0
X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-5.6, required=5.0, autolearn=disabled, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.551, UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL=-5, uiobl=NO, uiouri=NO)
X-UiO-Scanned: DCC29AA6B3CC73D2703252320B0F57BF43DADA87
X-UiO-SPAM-Test: remote_host: 129.240.68.135 spam_score: -55 maxlevel 80 minaction 2 bait 0 mail/h: 2 total 1876 max/h 12 blacklist 0 greylist 0 ratelimit 0
Cc: aqm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [aqm] Question re draft-baker-aqm-recommendations recomendation #6
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aqm>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 14:03:41 -0000

yo-ho!
(with ICCRG chair hat on  :-)    )


On 13. mai 2013, at 16:00, Fred Baker (fred) wrote:

> Do we generally agree with the recommendation of http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-baker-aqm-recommendation-01#section-4.6? This is the question of continuing research.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aqm mailing list
> aqm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email