Re: [arch-d] APN (Application-aware Networking) Mailing List

John Day <jeanjour@comcast.net> Sat, 15 August 2020 03:12 UTC

Return-Path: <jeanjour@comcast.net>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEC093A1535 for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 20:12:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=comcast.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8ig8zt5XcYme for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 20:11:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resqmta-ch2-02v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-02v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48A6F3A1536 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 20:11:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resomta-ch2-01v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.97]) by resqmta-ch2-02v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTP id 6mbkkmTpzP03C6mbtkFHa8; Sat, 15 Aug 2020 03:11:57 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=20190202a; t=1597461117; bh=SZEl9+gyp6REz7DZwLzMAcwc75XlZDQIvyMiWhEVszM=; h=Received:Received:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:Date: Message-Id:To; b=gQL/AtlMzWLXzYEdXq2iMpqMWwt+2qEb2BAjrAF0/NbzOCexiIyQuCmLlnRQgexxo geyQDKu6CKnDoBssWg03GLXTflzG/oQF64rXvX4m3VZUhLLyIOEJvUGMxp+9YKgodh oOvWWb+ndlRULFBYziBkat24PysNY3b82aiDZfLhubMNRWpUZe3NIZ1KJMZJR4/wUn 8CSnhTim8J7Tu0UtY2X8hSbERP0uVG8NPm/aOWptgikzhKuS+ddecNljPeZvIGjpMJ hRiLlivG3UOz+Fv7KdIXvyyEOGWy2pUoPg8wsj/rhB8U+JwIvhY9l/ti0LgX1DSa0T KEwD36Hp/J8dA==
Received: from [IPv6:2601:189:4300:cee9:6dcd:ffa6:b2b:581f] ([IPv6:2601:189:4300:cee9:6dcd:ffa6:b2b:581f]) by resomta-ch2-01v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTPSA id 6mbqk85GahXo46mbrkVkO5; Sat, 15 Aug 2020 03:11:56 +0000
X-Xfinity-VMeta: sc=-100.00;st=legit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.15\))
From: John Day <jeanjour@comcast.net>
In-Reply-To: <171DEAE6-BC06-44B8-88E9-64BA20850450@strayalpha.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2020 23:11:52 -0400
Cc: Lizhenbin <lizhenbin@huawei.com>, "architecture-discuss@ietf.org" <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>, "daniel@olddog.co.uk" <daniel@olddog.co.uk>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8E7FA3E3-21FF-4E84-8A89-B1CB2445A6AA@comcast.net>
References: <5A5B4DE12C0DAC44AF501CD9A2B01A8D9381CC52@dggemm512-mbs.china.huawei.com> <171DEAE6-BC06-44B8-88E9-64BA20850450@strayalpha.com>
To: Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/3g4SeNKMGRfJO0cFcBwewEWP0fU>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] APN (Application-aware Networking) Mailing List
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2020 03:12:01 -0000

No, these are the ones who think that your browser should be able to tell Windows what order to do the disk queue.

John

> On Aug 14, 2020, at 20:37, Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> wrote:
> 
> This WG appears to be revisiting the issues of the expired trigtran wg. It might be useful to understand why that did not succeed and whether you are asking the same question twice and expecting a different answer. 
> 
> Joe
> 
>> On Aug 12, 2020, at 9:25 PM, Lizhenbin <lizhenbin@huawei.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Folks,
>> 
>> The APN mailing list has been created. If you have interest in the work, please subscribe.
>> 
>> List address: apn@ietf.org
>> Archive: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/apn
>> To subscribe: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apn
>> 
>> Purpose:
>> This email list is the discussion list for the Application-aware Networking (APN). Application-aware Networking is a mechanism whereby traffic flows can be steered and routed within the network to ensure that the specific service levels needed by applications can be delivered.  
>> 
>> This list belongs to IETF area: RTG
>> 
>> 
>> Look forward to going on to have more discussion in the mailing list.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Best regards, 
>> Zhenbin (Robin)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ________________________________________
>> 发件人: Architecture-discuss [architecture-discuss-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Lizhenbin [lizhenbin@huawei.com]
>> 发送时间: 2020年7月29日 0:17
>> 收件人: architecture-discuss@ietf.org; rtgwg@ietf.org
>> 抄送: daniel@olddog.co.uk
>> 主题: [arch-d] APN (Application-aware Networking) Side Meeting
>> 
>> Hi All,
>> We will have the APN side meeting at 12:30 - 14:00 UTC on July 30 (Thursday). The agenda and the WebEx information is provided in the following link.
>> https://github.com/APN-Community/IETF108-Side-Meeting-APN
>> 
>> There has been several similar work like APN such as SPUD and PLUS. Recently Network Token work was also proposed. The side meeting is to try to clarify the scope of APN comparing with other work. The possible usecases are also proposed for the APN work. Another goal of the side meeting is to clarify the security and privacy issues which are always proposed against such application-ware networking work. In RTGWG session held yesterday, the presentation of APN work discussed the possible scenarios related with the security and privacy issues. The following slides is for your reference:
>> https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/108/slides/slides-108-rtgwg-8-rtgwg-apn6-01
>> 
>> Since it is a complex cross-area work and there is much background information, wish you could join the side meeting if you have interest in the work and your comments and suggestions are appreciated.
>> 
>> 
>> Best Regards,
>> Daniel & Zhenbin (Robin)
>> _______________________________________________
>> Architecture-discuss mailing list
>> Architecture-discuss@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss
>> _______________________________________________
>> Architecture-discuss mailing list
>> Architecture-discuss@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Architecture-discuss mailing list
> Architecture-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss