Re: [arch-d] Treating "private" address ranges specially

Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 08 April 2021 06:01 UTC

Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CD733A3B3C for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 23:01:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m1HbFqNYNuYq for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 23:01:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb34.google.com (mail-yb1-xb34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7ECA03A3B3B for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 23:01:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb34.google.com with SMTP id x189so1384703ybg.5 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 07 Apr 2021 23:01:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=TMg+EQxQ1/23LC+F9154qQiM8i4ZvchCsvFTWXJynXs=; b=Yvk8QFa/X+bcUU3pP1+KFdR6ZEzm6JMjEFVn3OsKbb+GsgAlOUnwAI14XTNq1YIRJc x9I7EnzVPCbjWgIm8ASYVsn/TNrq1lcd/699RIeGZ7BGxINKuHllLWuvPhPT9MWhaVu7 ZPCKbfaUuM0MIe8vRfyZTRVlb/uL9161ZOhcQRkECiBP7vKaNZriZIcHHvbRIEAguRK+ mhKfwiaxvsp+fDXp5SDXEWvy2UMDNWryfoWYwJOjFsss3drftxki9yYslnPRyDmF9lUn MNEgqk3+xZH3Wv/TFmGDr22XHqMltincTt1RditnhACiPvzQTBUjnWwZzI3CfxOU0v+l ujhw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=TMg+EQxQ1/23LC+F9154qQiM8i4ZvchCsvFTWXJynXs=; b=tivg5Rzqwwgu1WS0KMfDB+dooF5hqCazVqf3vOCg37Cq4i/6wCmY2acCCaurpTDCqB okgM2ljoqQ/A1mXhHWDb9QJ+8Mdv6Sq8tAWTD7AhjLs6wj/JMuvOUcJcwO5wodtvdVEQ 49+vlhMTTJ/iq17EzgIyzlyMVrE+9ngiViy9z2CBs+MqfCHH+eObZeJxVnV7mP62RT25 1CM8xVwCaeDJxlxODGyNE5vk53/eiSDfSuyFaXvMfrb6WQasMRxYga5VyAT7D+hLwxQT IbeJfkNf21oYraj4wju4bW1T5ZWUJb1Sun7q0TxNVAEMXEHceNSSqU5iGclMs1Itx/kh wFyg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5322bB80LaGPxj7UnrQI0jW3v15obNL/byPigy2Rf44WvqV23vt/ oQuW5R8JQiUZPEaR7fMF6jzaqhsp221unl0sD19CSGuZ
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyL88fEeqtKKVXvGf/GcA3N+n0rGdFCrG54dyDNndm+XbYEbtkBG4yU1TZp+pSVxQwRqLAEEkDNttmWW2kWi6A=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:fc4:: with SMTP id 187mr9843267ybp.84.1617861700645; Wed, 07 Apr 2021 23:01:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <4329d51a-d5ba-45b3-9fb0-6795dc6fccd3@www.fastmail.com> <CAMGpriWA4B8AThNKBOHo-bfAdQ2s5iYv8rBOB7X8UVc5GsqENA@mail.gmail.com> <CAMGpriUJkWYPyw7=oAj_GnGu2J14T3=VZYNWPZtAs870P=x0sg@mail.gmail.com> <a68636c2-5df0-46eb-8147-79ec6a992f8a@www.fastmail.com> <CAMGpriU_L8HbLFX_mMBtBXxy=XOc5BAnYgVR9R8TQO=DPvRD_g@mail.gmail.com> <F59E2FC3-19CE-4D14-9F1C-9F7125D89455@mnot.net> <CAMGpriVJCsird15oBfT=gSDTr59_yf9TkLmOSO7a9DGX0VRjOg@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMB2iOA-QaCidJHVN=qqZ8TtPXV=xyfuKh+i44VzZLWG3w@mail.gmail.com> <c88bbb17-4a30-4241-af98-436ddf01ca5c@www.fastmail.com> <CAKKJt-c8SsHLu+0F3czh8sx2uFnTOZEE_FXZXAAwHsnYxDVVPw@mail.gmail.com> <24de9a74-5f57-4328-aa0a-6dab888025d2@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <24de9a74-5f57-4328-aa0a-6dab888025d2@www.fastmail.com>
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2021 01:01:14 -0500
Message-ID: <CAKKJt-e51KosuYJEZkaXMpAOPv0QnbfM4_+nCVcNyKTxwA8NeA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
Cc: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f6778305bf6fc7aa"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/NfrDFuOxbvgk9Xj0mHWIFlNMUog>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] Treating "private" address ranges specially
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2021 06:01:51 -0000

Martin,

My apologies for not hitting "send" sooner, but I wanted to thank you for
this answer. It was helpful.

Best,

Spencer

On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 3:29 PM Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 2, 2021, at 02:30, Spencer Dawkins at IETF wrote:
> > Those notes are destined to go to W3C, in some way?
>
> This is in response to a request from the TAG for consideration.  It's
> part of a review they are conducting here:
> https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/572
>
> I've referenced Ted's recent summary in that thread, so I think that the
> feedback thus far has been received.
>
> I don't think that the TAG would object to receiving more comments there
> if they add new information, but it seems like most of the key points have
> been covered already.
>