IETF Logo Mail Archive

[arch-d] Re: [Architecture-discuss] 8+8 history (Re: Sources of architectural change)

Lloyd Wood <l.wood@eim.surrey.ac.uk> Wed, 02 November 2005 22:50 UTC

Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EXRR0-0000Hf-Sz; Wed, 02 Nov 2005 17:50:22 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EXRQz-0000GQ-Vc for architecture-discuss@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2005 17:50:22 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA13375 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Nov 2005 17:50:00 -0500 (EST)
Received: from prue.eim.surrey.ac.uk ([131.227.76.5] ident=exim) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EXRff-0002qW-07 for architecture-discuss@ietf.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2005 18:05:32 -0500
Received: from argos.ee.surrey.ac.uk ([131.227.89.15] ident=eep1lw) by prue.eim.surrey.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #4) id 1EXRQU-0004A1-00; Wed, 02 Nov 2005 22:49:50 +0000
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 22:49:47 +0000
From: Lloyd Wood <l.wood@eim.surrey.ac.uk>
X-X-Sender: eep1lw@argos.ee.surrey.ac.uk
To: "Edward A. Gardner" <eag@ophidian.com>
In-Reply-To: <4.3.1.2.20051102073045.00b75630@pop3.mailpci.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.50.0511022248440.18003-100000@argos.ee.surrey.ac.uk>
References: <E3B3196D-23E1-4EC0-9979-C8AE75E57EC6@tony.li> <20051027122404.F31AA86AEE@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> <B0F996AD-8A42-43DF-874A-C6E67CB2F1DE@tony.li> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0510290935250.11815@netcore.fi> <AB9465E06F2E97C7E7F7E674@svartdal.hjemme.alvestrand.no> <CF6037C6-175B-4439-AECA-F5A7A5996356@tony.li> <4368482B.2020808@thinkingcat.com> <33C7305E-DCCB-4094-B8BD-1F3BDEFFBC63@tony.li> <4368580A.4040607@thinkingcat.com> <E3B3196D-23E1-4EC0-9979-C8AE75E57EC6@tony.li> <4.3.1.2.20051102073045.00b75630@pop3.mailpci.net>
Organization: speaking for none
X-url: http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/
X-no-archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Scanner: exiscan *1EXRQU-0004A1-00*AA9h0z9p.Yk* (SECM, UniS)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: bb8f917bb6b8da28fc948aeffb74aa17
Cc: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: [arch-d] Re: [Architecture-discuss] 8+8 history (Re: Sources of architectural change)
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/architecture-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: architecture-discuss-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: architecture-discuss-bounces@ietf.org

On Wed, 2 Nov 2005, Edward A. Gardner wrote:

> At 03:31 02-11-2005, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
> >Since this is ancient history for most of us, some rehashing may be in
> >order, at least about what the history was....
>
> Not only is it ancient history, many/most of us lurkers have no idea what
> draft-ietf-ipngwg-gseaddr proposed or is about and have no idea what the
> rest of you are talking about.

http://www.watersprings.org/pub/id/draft-odell-8%2B8-00.txt
http://www.watersprings.org/pub/id/draft-ietf-ipngwg-gseaddr-00.txt

http://www.watersprings.org/pub/id/draft-ietf-ipngwg-esd-analysis-00.txt
through to
http://www.watersprings.org/pub/id/draft-ietf-ipngwg-esd-analysis-05.txt

Watersprings is a useful tool.

Get up to speed.

L.

> And as all the tombstones say, it wasn't an
> archival document.
>
> If rehashing that decision is important to this discussion list, would
> someone please post a technical summary of that proposal or a pointer to one?
>
> If rehashing that decision isn't relevant or constructive, maybe we can
> proceed on to something that is?
>
> Ed Gardner

<http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/><L.Wood@eim.surrey.ac.uk>

_______________________________________________
Architecture-discuss mailing list
Architecture-discuss@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email